DEXIS / Envista
Step-by-step implementation guide β pre-implementation checklist, onboarding, staff training, go-live runbook, and ROI tracking.
DEXIS / Envista β Implementation Playbook (DSO)
DEXIS Diagnostic Imaging AI Implementation Playbook
Enterprise Deployment Guide for Dental Support Organizations
1. Executive Summary
What DEXIS Delivers
DEXIS, part of the Envista Holdings portfolio, provides AI-powered diagnostic imaging solutions that automatically analyze dental radiographs to detect pathologies including caries, periapical lesions, calculus, and bone loss. The system integrates with existing imaging workflows to provide real-time diagnostic assistance, generating visual overlays and confidence scores that supportβbut do not replaceβclinical decision-making.
Why DSOs Gain Disproportionate Value from Diagnostic Imaging AI
Scale Advantages:
- Standardized diagnostic protocols across 15β50+ locations eliminate provider-to-provider variability that plagues multi-site operations
- Centralized data aggregation enables portfolio-wide clinical insights impossible to achieve with siloed imaging systems
- Bulk licensing negotiations and shared infrastructure reduce per-location implementation costs by 30β40%
Operational Leverage:
- Consistent AI-assisted diagnostics support associate dentists who may lack decades of radiographic interpretation experience
- Real-time detection reduces missed pathologyβa liability risk that compounds across locations
- Standardized imaging workflows accelerate new provider onboarding from weeks to days
- Aggregated diagnostic data creates defensible clinical quality metrics for payor negotiations and M&A due diligence
Financial Impact at Scale:
- Case acceptance improvements of 10β25% compound meaningfully across 15β50 locations
- Reduced re-treatment rates from missed diagnoses protect margins
- Documentation enhancement supports higher-value coding and reduces claim denials
Expected Timeline: Decision to Full Deployment
| Phase | Timeline | Milestone |
|---|---|---|
| Decision to Wave 1 Go-Live | Weeks 1β6 | 2β3 pilot locations fully operational |
| Wave 1 Stabilization | Weeks 7β10 | Pilot learnings documented, go/no-go for Wave 2 |
| Wave 2 Deployment | Weeks 11β16 | Next 5β8 locations live |
| Wave 3+ Full Rollout | Weeks 17β24 | Remaining locations deployed |
| Total Portfolio Deployment | 5β6 months | All locations live and optimized |
Note: Timeline assumes 25-location DSO. Scale appropriately for portfolio size.
2. Pre-Implementation Checklist (Weeks 1β2)
Technical Requirements
Hardware Requirements (Per Location)
β Workstations: Minimum Intel i5 (8th gen+) or AMD Ryzen 5, 16GB RAM, SSD storage β Display: Medical-grade monitors recommended; minimum 1920x1080 resolution β Existing sensors: Verify DEXIS sensor compatibility or identify upgrade requirements β Server (if on-premise component): Confirm specifications with Envista technical team π΅
Software Requirements
β Operating system: Windows 10/11 Professional (64-bit) across all clinical workstations β Practice Management System: Confirm version compatibility (see Section 5) β Imaging software: Current DEXIS Imaging Suite or migration path identified β Browser requirements: Chrome/Edge latest version for any web-based components
Network Requirements β οΈ
β Bandwidth: Minimum 100 Mbps symmetric per location; 250+ Mbps recommended for high-volume sites β Latency: <50ms to cloud endpoints for real-time AI analysis β Firewall: Whitelist DEXIS/Envista cloud endpoints (request list from vendor) π΅ β VPN/SD-WAN: Confirm AI traffic routing through existing network architecture
Estimated time: 4β6 hours for technical audit per location
Enterprise-Level Requirements
Network Standards Across Locations π£
β Document current network topology across all locationsβidentify inconsistencies β Establish minimum network performance standards for AI-ready certification β Determine centralized vs. location-level hosting model:
- Centralized cloud: Single tenant, simplified management, requires consistent connectivity
- Distributed cloud: Per-location instances, more resilient, higher management overhead
- Hybrid: Central analytics with local processingβevaluate with Envista π΅
Identity and Access Management π£
β SSO integration: Confirm SAML 2.0 or OAuth compatibility with existing identity provider (Okta, Azure AD, etc.) β Role-based access control: Map DEXIS permission levels to DSO role hierarchy β Centralized credentialing: Establish process for provider credential verification prior to AI access β Automated provisioning/deprovisioning: Integrate with HR systems for staff changes
Estimated time: 8β12 hours for enterprise architecture decisions
Vendor Onboarding Steps
| Step | Owner | Timeline | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|
| π΅ Execute enterprise license agreement | Legal/Procurement + Envista | Week 1 | Signed MSA and order form |
| π΅ Assign dedicated Envista implementation manager | Vendor | Week 1 | Named contact with direct line |
| π΅ Conduct technical discovery call | IT + Envista | Week 1 | Infrastructure gap assessment |
| π΅ Obtain enterprise admin credentials | IT + Envista | Week 1 | Admin portal access confirmed |
| π΅ Establish support escalation matrix | Operations + Envista | Week 1 | Documented support tiers and SLAs |
| π΅ Schedule kickoff with clinical leadership | CDO + Envista | Week 2 | Clinical workflow walkthrough |
Key Contacts to Establish
β Envista Implementation Manager: Primary point of contact for deployment coordination β Envista Technical Support Lead: Escalation contact for integration issues β Envista Clinical Specialist: Provider training and workflow optimization β Envista Enterprise Account Executive: Commercial issues, licensing questions
Estimated time: 3β4 hours of calls in Week 1
Data/Access Prerequisites
Per Location
β Local admin credentials for all clinical workstations β PMS admin credentials with API access (if applicable) β Imaging archive accessβconfirm storage location and format (DICOM, proprietary) β Sample image export for test validation (10β20 representative images)
Enterprise Level
β Centralized asset inventory: Hardware/software versions at each location β API keys for PMS integration (enterprise agreement if applicable) β Historical imaging data migration scope: Define date range and volume π£ β Data governance: Confirm image storage, retention, and cross-location access policies
Estimated time: 2β3 hours per location for data/access assembly
Internal Stakeholder Alignment
Stakeholder Alignment Map
| Stakeholder Group | Role in Implementation | Required Action | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| π£ Board/Investors | Approve capital expenditure; understand AI strategy | Investment memo review, quarterly update commitment | Week 1 |
| π£ C-Suite (CEO/CFO/CDO) | Champion initiative; allocate resources; approve rollout sequence | Steering committee formation, bi-weekly briefing commitment | Week 1 |
| Regional Managers | Cascade communication; monitor location readiness; resolve local blockers | Briefing session, location assessment ownership | Week 2 |
| Location Office Managers | Coordinate local logistics; champion adoption with staff | Readiness assessment participation, champion nomination | Week 2 |
| Providers (Dentists/Hygienists) | Clinical adoption; workflow integration; patient communication | Awareness communication; training commitment | Week 2β3 |
| IT/Operations | Technical deployment; integration; support | Technical requirements sign-off, testing participation | Weeks 1β2 |
| Billing/RCM | Understand documentation impact; adjust coding as needed | Briefing on AI documentation capabilities | Week 3 |
Approval Gates π£
β Budget approval: Enterprise license, implementation services, hardware upgrades β IT security review: HIPAA compliance, data handling, vendor security posture β Clinical leadership endorsement: CDO confirmation of clinical value β Rollout sequence approval: Wave structure and location selection
Estimated time: 10β15 hours for stakeholder alignment activities
Baseline Metrics Capture β οΈ
Critical: Capture these metrics BEFORE any go-live to enable ROI measurement
Standardized Baseline Metrics (Identical Measurement Across All Locations)
| Metric | How to Measure | Source System | Measurement Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case acceptance rate | Treatment presented Γ· Treatment accepted | PMS reporting | Prior 90 days |
| Radiographic findings per patient | Average pathologies documented per exam | PMS clinical notes | Prior 90 days |
| Time from imaging to treatment presentation | Image capture timestamp to treatment plan creation | PMS workflow audit | Sample 50 patients |
| Diagnostic re-treatment rate | Retreatments due to missed pathology | Clinical audit | Prior 12 months |
| Claim denial rate (diagnostic codes) | Denied claims for D0120-D0999 | RCM system | Prior 90 days |
| Provider radiograph interpretation time | Minutes per FMX review | Time study | Sample 10 exams/provider |
| Patient volume (imaging) | Radiographic exams per week | Imaging system logs | Prior 90 days |
Baseline Capture Process
β Designate baseline data owner (recommend: VP of Operations or Analytics lead) β Create standardized data collection template for all locations β Train office managers on consistent metric capture methodology β οΈ β Set data submission deadline: End of Week 2 β Validate data quality before aggregationβflag outliers for investigation β Store baseline data in accessible format for post-launch comparison
Estimated time: 4β6 hours per location for baseline data collection
3. Location Readiness Assessment
Scoring Framework
Rate each location on the following factors using a 1β5 scale:
Factor 1: IT Infrastructure Maturity (Weight: 25%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Enterprise-grade network (250+ Mbps), workstations <2 years old, current PMS version |
| 4 | Strong network (100+ Mbps), workstations <3 years old, PMS version within 1 release |
| 3 | Adequate network (50+ Mbps), mixed workstation age, PMS version within 2 releases |
| 2 | Inconsistent network, aging workstations, PMS version outdated by 2+ releases |
| 1 | Poor network, workstations >5 years old, PMS significantly outdated |
Factor 2: Staff Tenure and Adaptability (Weight: 20%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Low turnover (<15%/yr), previous successful tech adoption, high training completion rates |
| 4 | Moderate turnover (15β25%/yr), recent tech adoption with minor issues, good training compliance |
| 3 | Average turnover (25β35%/yr), mixed tech adoption history, training compliance adequate |
| 2 | High turnover (35β50%/yr), previous tech adoption challenges, training compliance spotty |
| 1 | Very high turnover (>50%/yr), tech adoption failures, training compliance poor |
Factor 3: Patient Volume (Weight: 20%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | High volume (200+ patients/week): Maximum impact potential, experienced staff |
| 4 | Above average (150β200 patients/week): Strong impact potential |
| 3 | Average (100β150 patients/week): Moderate impact potential |
| 2 | Below average (50β100 patients/week): Lower impact, good for learning |
| 1 | Low volume (<50 patients/week): Limited ROI, save for later waves |
Note: For pilot locations, consider scoring 3 (moderate volume) as idealβhigh enough impact to matter, low enough risk to manage issues.
Factor 4: Tech Stack Compatibility (Weight: 20%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | DEXIS imaging already in use, compatible PMS with proven API, no integration conflicts |
| 4 | Compatible imaging system, PMS integration documented, minimal conflicts |
| 3 | Compatible systems with some integration work required |
| 2 | Incompatible imaging system (upgrade required) OR significant PMS integration challenges |
| 1 | Major system upgrades required before deployment feasible |
Factor 5: Local Champion Availability (Weight: 15%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Tech-forward provider AND engaged office manager willing to lead adoption |
| 4 | Strong champion in one role (provider or office manager) |
| 3 | Willing participants but no clear champion identified |
| 2 | Staff resistance identified; no champion emerged |
| 1 | Active opposition from key staff members |
Composite Readiness Score Calculation
Formula:
Composite Score = (IT Γ 0.25) + (Staff Γ 0.20) + (Volume Γ 0.20) + (Tech Stack Γ 0.20) + (Champion Γ 0.15)
Score Interpretation
| Composite Score | Readiness Tier | Deployment Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0 β 5.0 | Tier 1: Pilot Ready | Wave 1 candidate |
| 3.0 β 3.9 | Tier 2: Standard Ready | Wave 2 candidate |
| 2.0 β 2.9 | Tier 3: Needs Preparation | Wave 3 after remediation |
| 1.0 β 1.9 | Tier 4: Not Ready | Defer deployment; address blockers |
Sample Location Assessment Matrix
| Location | IT (1-5) | Staff (1-5) | Volume (1-5) | Tech Stack (1-5) | Champion (1-5) | Composite | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location A | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4.35 | Tier 1 |
| Location B | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | Tier 1 |
| Location C | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3.55 | Tier 2 |
| Location D | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2.90 | Tier 3 |
| Location E | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | Tier 4 |
Rollout Sequence Recommendation
Wave 1 Selection Criteria (2β3 Locations)
β Composite score β₯4.0 β Geographic proximity for efficient on-site support β οΈ β Representative of broader portfolio (mix of provider types, patient demographics) β NOT your highest-revenue locations (limit downside risk) β NOT locations with major competing initiatives (renovations, provider transitions)
Wave 2 Selection (Next 5β8 Locations)
β Composite score 3.5β4.5 β Address geographic coverage (reduce travel burden for rollout team) β Include at least one higher-volume location to stress-test workflows β Include at least one specialty-focused location if applicable
Wave 3+ Selection (Remaining Locations)
β All Tier 2 and remediated Tier 3 locations β Sequence by regional cluster for support efficiency β Save Tier 4 locations for final waves after full remediation
Estimated time: 8β10 hours total for full portfolio assessment
4. Rollout Strategy
Wave Structure
Recommended Wave Structure for 25-Location DSO
| Wave | Locations | Timeline | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wave 1 (Pilot) | 2β3 locations | Weeks 4β6 | Validate workflows, identify issues, build internal expertise |
| Buffer/Learning | β | Weeks 7β10 | Document learnings, refine training, adjust configuration |
| Wave 2 (Expansion) | 5β8 locations | Weeks 11β16 | Scale deployment model, stress-test support structure |
| Buffer/Optimization | β | Weeks 17β18 | Process refinements, prepare for final push |
| Wave 3 (Completion) | Remaining 14β18 locations | Weeks 19β24 | Full portfolio deployment |
Wave 1 Pilot Location Selection Criteria π£
Select locations that maximize learning while minimizing risk:
β High Readiness (Tier 1): Composite score β₯4.0 ensures smooth deployment β Engaged Local Champion: Tech-forward provider actively supportive β Manageable Volume: Medium patient volume (100β150/week) limits exposure β Geographic Accessibility: Within 2-hour travel for on-site support β Operational Stability: No major staff changes, renovations, or competing projects β Representative Portfolio Mix: Include at least one GP-focused and one specialty-influenced location β NOT Flagship Locations: Protect highest-revenue sites from pilot issues
Timeline Per Wave
Wave 1 Detail (Weeks 4β6)
| Week | Activities | Deliverables |
|---|---|---|
| Week 4 | Configuration, integration, test environment validation | Locations technically ready |
| Week 5 | Staff training, parallel workflows, soft launch | Teams trained, running alongside legacy |
| Week 6 | Go-live, daily monitoring, issue resolution | Full production operation |
Wave 2+ Detail (5β8 Locations Per Wave)
| Week | Activities | Deliverables |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1 of Wave | Technical prep for all wave locations simultaneously | All locations technically ready |
| Week 2 of Wave | Champion training, train-the-trainer deployment | Champions certified |
| Week 3 of Wave | Staff training, soft launch (staggered by 1β2 days) | Teams trained |
| Week 4 of Wave | Go-live (staggered by 1β2 days), stabilization | All wave locations live |
| Weeks 5β6 of Wave | Monitoring, optimization, learning documentation | Wave complete, ready for next |
Go/No-Go Criteria π£
Criteria to Advance from Wave 1 to Wave 2
| Criterion | Threshold | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Stability | <5 critical issues in final week | Issue tracking log |
| User Adoption | >80% of providers using AI consistently | Usage analytics |
| Workflow Integration | <10% increase in patient cycle time | Time study comparison |
| Staff Satisfaction | Average β₯3.5/5 on pulse survey | Post-go-live survey |
| Patient Impact | No patient complaints attributable to AI | Complaint tracking |
| Support Capacity | Vendor + internal support adequately handled volume | Support ticket review |
Go Decision: All criteria met, or mitigation plan approved for any gaps No-Go Decision: Any criterion critically failed with no viable mitigation
Rollback Plan β οΈ
If a Wave Fails:
Immediate Actions (Within 24 Hours) β Halt deployment of any remaining locations in current wave β Notify all stakeholders per communication plan β Convene emergency steering committee π£ β Document failure mode in detail
Affected Location Options β Pause: Disable AI features, continue with legacy workflow, schedule remediation β Revert: Full removal of AI components, return to pre-deployment state β Isolate: Continue in limited capacity with enhanced monitoring
Unaffected Location Protection β Previously deployed locations continue unchanged (unless systemic issue identified) β Upcoming wave locations postponed until root cause addressed β Timeline adjusted; communicate revised schedule to all stakeholders
Recovery Process β Root cause analysis (involve vendor) π΅ β Remediation plan development and approval π£ β Controlled re-deployment with additional monitoring β Extended buffer period before resuming wave structure
5. Configuration & Integration (Weeks 2β3)
Practice Management System Integration
Dentrix Enterprise Integration
| Step | Action | Owner | Time Est. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verify Dentrix version compatibility (G7.2+ recommended) | IT | 30 min |
| 2 | π΅ Request DEXIS-Dentrix integration module from Envista | IT + Vendor | 1 day |
| 3 | Install integration module on Dentrix server | IT | 2 hours |
| 4 | β οΈ Configure patient linking: Match patient IDs between systems | IT | 2 hours |
| 5 | Enable bidirectional image transfer | IT | 1 hour |
| 6 | Configure AI findings export to clinical notes | IT + Clinical | 2 hours |
| 7 | Test patient lookup, image transfer, findings documentation | IT | 2 hours |
| 8 | Validate across 10 sample patients | IT + Provider | 1 hour |
Total estimated time: 1β2 days per location
Eaglesoft Integration
| Step | Action | Owner | Time Est. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verify Eaglesoft version (21.0+ recommended) | IT | 30 min |
| 2 | π΅ Obtain Patterson-approved DEXIS connector | IT + Vendor | 1 day |
| 3 | Install connector on server and workstations | IT | 3 hours |
| 4 | β οΈ Configure image file path mapping | IT | 1 hour |
| 5 | Enable treatment plan integration (if applicable) | IT + Clinical | 2 hours |
| 6 | Test end-to-end workflow | IT + Provider | 2 hours |
Total estimated time: 1β2 days per location
Open Dental Integration
| Step | Action | Owner | Time Est. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verify Open Dental version (current stable release) | IT | 30 min |
| 2 | Enable Open Dental bridge for DEXIS | IT | 1 hour |
| 3 | β οΈ Configure image module integration (Open Dental imaging vs. external) | IT | 2 hours |
| 4 | π΅ Implement API-based data exchange if required | IT + Vendor | 4 hours |
| 5 | Test bidirectional workflow | IT + Provider | 2 hours |
Total estimated time: 1 day per location
Imaging System Integration
DEXIS Sensor Integration (Native)
| Step | Action | Owner | Time Est. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Update DEXIS Imaging Suite to current version | IT | 1 hour |
| 2 | π΅ Activate AI module license key | IT + Vendor | 30 min |
| 3 | Configure AI analysis preferences (sensitivity, pathology types) | Clinical + IT | 1 hour |
| 4 | Validate sensor connectivity with AI analysis | IT | 30 min |
| 5 | Test overlay display and confidence score presentation | Provider | 30 min |
Third-Party Sensor Migration (If Applicable) β οΈ
| Step | Action | Owner | Time Est. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Assess current sensor brand and compatibility | IT + Vendor | 1 hour |
| 2 | π΅ Obtain compatibility certification from Envista | Vendor | 1β5 days |
| 3 | If incompatible: Budget and schedule sensor upgrade π£ | Finance + IT | Variable |
| 4 | Install DEXIS integration layer for compatible sensors | IT | 2 hours |
| 5 | Validate image quality and AI analysis with non-native sensors | IT + Provider | 1 hour |
Test Environment Setup
Centralized Test Environment (Recommended for DSO)
β π΅ Request dedicated test tenant from Envista with DSO-wide access β Configure test tenant to mirror production settings β Populate with anonymized sample images from multiple locations β Grant access to IT, clinical leadership, and designated testers β Establish test data refresh cadence (weekly recommended)
Validation Checklist (Per Location)
| Test | Pass Criteria | Tested By | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient data sync: PMS β DEXIS | Patient record appears in both systems within 30 seconds | IT | |
| Image capture: AI analysis trigger | AI overlay appears within 5 seconds of image capture | Provider | |
| AI findings: Accuracy spot-check | AI findings align with provider assessment on 5 sample images | Provider | |
| AI findings: Documentation export | Findings appear in PMS clinical notes accurately | IT + Provider | |
| Reporting: Usage metrics capture | Dashboard reflects test activity | IT | |
| Performance: System response time | No degradation vs. pre-AI baseline | IT |
Data Migration / Historical Image Ingestion
Scope Decision π£
| Option | Pros | Cons | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No historical import | Fastest deployment, lowest risk | AI only analyzes new images | Recommended for initial deployment |
| Recent history (90 days) | Catch recent pathology, manageable volume | Requires batch processing time | Consider for Wave 2+ |
| Full history | Complete patient picture | Large volume, time-consuming, potential data quality issues | Rarely justified; defer to optimization phase |
Historical Import Process (If Elected)
β π΅ Coordinate batch import timeline with Envista β Export images in DICOM format from existing archive β β οΈ Validate patient ID mapping between systems before import β Schedule import during off-hours to minimize performance impact β Monitor import progress; validate sample of imported images β Document any import failures for manual remediation
Security and HIPAA Compliance
Enterprise-Level HIPAA Checklist π£
| Requirement | Status | Owner | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| β BAA executed with Envista | Legal | Signed BAA document | |
| β Envista SOC 2 Type II report reviewed | IT Security | Audit report on file | |
| β Data encryption in transit (TLS 1.2+) | IT | Configuration verification | |
| β Data encryption at rest (AES-256) | IT/Vendor | Vendor attestation | |
| β Access controls configured per role | IT | RBAC documentation | |
| β Audit logging enabled | IT | Log sample review | |
| β Data residency confirmed (US-only if required) | IT/Vendor | Vendor attestation | |
| β Incident response plan updated to include AI system | IT Security | Updated IRP document | |
| β Patient consent reviewed (if applicable) | Compliance/Legal | Consent form review | |
| β Provider training on AI disclosure (if required by state) | Compliance | Training completion records |
Standardized vs. Location-Specific Configuration π£
Standardize Centrally
| Setting | Recommended Standard | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| AI sensitivity level | "Balanced" (default) | Consistency in diagnostic presentation |
| Pathology categories enabled | All standard categories | Complete diagnostic picture |
| Overlay display format | Color-coded highlighting | Uniform patient communication |
| Documentation template | Standard AI findings format | Consistent clinical notes |
| User permission levels | Enterprise RBAC | Security consistency |
Allow Local Discretion
| Setting | Permitted Variation | Approval Required |
|---|---|---|
| Confidence score display | Show/hide based on provider preference | Office manager |
| AI assistant audio cues | Enable/disable | Office manager |
| Secondary review workflow | Optional peer review trigger | Regional manager |
| Patient-facing display | Show/hide AI overlay during case presentation | Provider |
6. Team Training Plan
Train-the-Trainer Model
Champion Selection Criteria
β Role: Provider (preferred) or Office Manager with strong clinical credibility β Tech Comfort: History of successful technology adoption β Influence: Respected by peers; opinion shapes team behavior β Availability: Willing to commit 4β6 hours to certification and ongoing support β Communication: Can explain technical concepts simply β Attitude: Genuinely supportive of AI adoption (not grudging compliance)
Champion Responsibilities
| Responsibility | Time Commitment | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Complete certification training | 4 hours | One-time |
| Deliver role-specific training to location staff | 4β6 hours | Pre-go-live |
| Provide day-one support | Full day | Go-live |
| Conduct daily check-ins with central team | 15 min | First 2 weeks |
| Collect and escalate staff feedback | 30 min | Weekly ongoing |
| Train new hires | 1 hour | As needed |
| Lead quarterly refresher sessions | 30 min | Quarterly |
Champion Certification Process π΅
| Step | Method | Duration | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Complete Envista online learning modules | 2 hours | Module completion certificate |
| 2 | Attend live train-the-trainer session (virtual or in-person) | 2 hours | Session attendance |
| 3 | Pass competency assessment (80% threshold) | 30 min | Assessment score |
| 4 | Deliver practice training session (observed) | 30 min | Sign-off from clinical leader |
| 5 | Receive champion toolkit and materials | β | Materials in hand |
Role-Specific Training Outlines
Dentists/Providers
Training Duration: 90 minutes Format: Live demo (45 min) + hands-on practice (30 min) + Q&A (15 min) Delivered By: Location champion + Envista clinical specialist (Wave 1 only) π΅
Content Modules:
Understanding AI Diagnostic Assistance (15 min)
- What the AI does and doesn't do
- Confidence scores explained
- AI as assistant, not replacement for clinical judgment
- Liability and documentation implications
Workflow Integration (20 min)
- Where AI appears in the imaging workflow
- How to access AI findings
- How to accept, modify, or dismiss AI suggestions
- Documenting clinical decision when differing from AI
Clinical Interpretation (30 min)
- Reading AI overlays and pathology indicators
- Understanding sensitivity/specificity tradeoffs
- When AI typically excels vs. requires more scrutiny
- Case studies: AI-assisted diagnosis examples
Patient Communication (15 min)
- How to explain AI to patients
- Using AI visuals in case presentation
- Addressing patient questions/concerns about AI
Hands-On Practice (30 min)
- Process 5 sample cases with AI assistance
- Practice workflow from image capture to documentation
- Practice patient communication script
Common Resistance Points & Responses:
| Resistance | Response |
|---|---|
| "I don't need AI to read X-rays" | "This is a second set of eyes to catch what any human might miss on a busy day. It supports your expertise, not replaces it." |
| "What if the AI is wrong?" | "You remain the diagnostician. The AI is a toolβyou can and should override when your clinical judgment differs." |
| "This will slow me down" | "Initial learning curve is 1β2 weeks. After that, most providers report faster, more confident diagnoses." |
| "My patients won't trust a computer" | "Patients respond well to visual proof. The AI visuals actually increase case acceptance in most practices." |
Day 1 Cheat Sheet for Providers: (Single page, tape to monitor)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β DEXIS AI QUICK REFERENCE β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β 1. CAPTURE: Image as normalβAI runs automatically β
β β
β 2. REVIEW: Look for colored overlays β
β π΄ Red = High confidence finding β
β π‘ Yellow = Moderate confidence β
β π΅ Blue = Low confidence/suggested review β
β β
β 3. INTERPRET: Click any finding for details β
β - Pathology type β
β - Confidence % β
β - Reference points β
β β
β 4. DECIDE: Accept, modify, or dismiss β
β YOUR clinical judgment is final β
β β
β 5. DOCUMENT: Click "Export to Notes" β
β Findings auto-populate in PMS β
β Add your clinical commentary β
β β
β 6. PRESENT: Use AI visuals with patient β
β "I'm using advanced imaging technology that β
β helps identify areas of concern..." β
β β
β β οΈ ISSUE? Contact: [Champion name] or ext. [XXX] β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Hygienists
Training Duration: 45 minutes Format: Live demo (20 min) + hands-on practice (15 min) + Q&A (10 min) Delivered By: Location champion
Content Modules:
Role in AI Workflow (10 min)
- How AI analyzes images taken during prophylaxis
- What hygienists will see on screen
- Calculus detection feature specific to hygiene
Using AI for Patient Education (15 min)
- Showing AI findings to patients during cleaning
- Supporting provider case presentations
- Reinforcing treatment recommendations
Escalation Workflow (10 min)
- When to flag AI findings for provider review
- How to document hygiene-observed findings
Hands-On Practice (15 min)
- Process 3 sample hygiene cases
- Practice patient education dialogue
Common Resistance Points & Responses:
| Resistance | Response |
|---|---|
| "This isn't part of my job" | "AI enhances your ability to educate patients and support comprehensive care. It's not additional workβit's better tools for what you already do." |
| "I can see calculus without AI" | "Of course. AI helps visualize it for patients and ensures nothing is missed subgingivally." |
Day 1 Cheat Sheet for Hygienists:
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β DEXIS AI FOR HYGIENE - QUICK REFERENCE β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β WHAT YOU'LL SEE: β
β - AI overlays appear after imaging β
β - Calculus deposits highlighted in [green] β
β - Other findings highlighted for provider β
β β
β YOUR ROLE: β
β β Note AI findings visible during prophy β
β β Show findings to patient: "You can see here..." β
β β Flag concerns for doctor review β
β β
β DO NOT: Make diagnostic statements to patients β
β ("You have decay" β leave that to provider) β
β β
β β οΈ ISSUE? Contact: [Champion name] or ext. [XXX] β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Front Desk / Office Manager
Training Duration: 30 minutes Format: Live demo (15 min) + system walkthrough (10 min) + Q&A (5 min) Delivered By: Location champion
Content Modules:
Patient Communication (10 min)
- Answering patient questions about AI
- Explaining AI benefits in simple terms
- Sample scripts for phone and in-person inquiries
Scheduling Considerations (5 min)
- Any appointment length adjustments during rollout
- Flagging patients for AI-assisted exams (if applicable)
Administrative Functions (10 min)
- Accessing usage reports
- Basic troubleshooting (restart workflow)
- When to contact champion vs. escalate
Reporting Basics (5 min)
- Locating AI activity dashboards
- Metrics to monitor weekly
Day 1 Cheat Sheet for Front Desk:
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β DEXIS AI FOR FRONT DESK - QUICK REFERENCE β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β PATIENT QUESTIONS: β
β β
β Q: "What is this AI thing?" β
β A: "We've added advanced imaging technology that β
β helps Dr. [Name] identify dental issues more β
β accurately. It's another tool to give you the β
β best possible care." β
β β
β Q: "Is a computer diagnosing me?" β
β A: "NoβDr. [Name] makes all diagnoses. The AI β
β is a helper that highlights areas to review. β
β Your dentist is always in charge." β
β β
β Q: "Is this safe?" β
β A: "Absolutely. It analyzes the same X-rays we've β
β always taken. No additional radiation." β
β β
β β οΈ ISSUE? Contact: [Champion name] or ext. [XXX] β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Billing/Insurance Staff
Training Duration: 30 minutes Format: Live demo (15 min) + coding review (10 min) + Q&A (5 min) Delivered By: Location champion + RCM representative
Content Modules:
Documentation Changes (10 min)
- How AI findings appear in clinical notes
- Enhanced documentation detail for claims support
- Narrative export features
Coding Considerations (15 min)
- No new codes required for AI-assisted diagnosis
- AI documentation supports medical necessity
- Strategies for using AI visuals in appeals
Claim Impact Monitoring (5 min)
- Metrics to track (denial rates, resubmission rates)
- Reporting to central RCM team
Day 1 Cheat Sheet for Billing:
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β DEXIS AI FOR BILLING - QUICK REFERENCE β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β WHAT CHANGES: β
β - Clinical notes may include AI-assisted findings β
β - Diagnoses are MORE thoroughly documented β
β - This SUPPORTS claims, not complicates them β
β β
β CODING: β
β - No new CDT codes for AI β
β - Standard diagnostic codes apply β
β - AI doesn't change what you bill β
β β
β APPEALS: β
β - AI images can be included in appeal packets β
β - Contact [Champion] for image exports β
β β
β MONITOR: β
β - Track D0120-D0999 denial rates monthly β
β - Report changes to [RCM contact] β
β β
β β οΈ ISSUE? Contact: [Champion name] or ext. [XXX] β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Training Completion Tracking
Pre-Go-Live Training Gate β οΈ
No location goes live until training completion verified:
| Role | Training Required | Completion Verification |
|---|---|---|
| Champion | Certification complete | Certificate on file |
| All providers | Role training complete | Signed attestation |
| All hygienists | Role training complete | Signed attestation |
| Front desk staff | Role training complete | Signed attestation |
| Billing staff | Role training complete | Signed attestation |
Tracking Mechanism
β Create centralized training completion spreadsheet (or LMS if available) β Champion reports completions daily during training week β Regional manager validates completion before go-live sign-off β Training records retained for compliance purposes
Ongoing Training Cadence
| Training Type | Frequency | Audience | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| New hire onboarding | As needed | New staff | 30β90 min (by role) |
| Quarterly refresher | Quarterly | All clinical staff | 15 min |
| Feature updates | As released | Champions β cascade | 15β30 min |
| Annual certification | Annually | Champions | 1 hour |
7. Change Management
Executive Sponsor Communication Plan
Board/Investor Updates π£
| Touchpoint | Frequency | Content | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-launch briefing | Once (Week 1) | Investment rationale, expected ROI, timeline | CEO/CFO |
| Quarterly update | Quarterly | Deployment progress, early metrics, risk status | CEO |
| Investment committee | As scheduled | AI as strategic capability, portfolio value impact | CEO/CFO |
| Exit/M&A materials | As needed | AI adoption as technology maturity indicator | CFO |
Board-Ready Talking Points:
- "We are deploying AI-assisted diagnostic imaging to standardize clinical quality across [X] locations"
- "This investment reduces diagnostic variability, supports case acceptance, and positions us as a technology-forward operator"
- "Expected full deployment by [date] with measurable ROI within 6 months"
C-Suite Communication
| Touchpoint | Frequency | Content | Attendees |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering committee | Bi-weekly | Deployment status, decisions needed, risk escalation | CEO, CDO, CFO, VP Ops |
| CDO clinical review | Weekly | Clinical adoption, provider feedback, workflow issues | CDO, clinical leads |
| CFO financial review | Monthly | Budget tracking, ROI progress, investment performance | CFO, VP Ops |
Regional Manager Briefing Guide
Purpose: Equip regional managers to cascade rollout information effectively
Briefing Deck Structure (30 Minutes)
What We're Doing and Why (5 min)
- DEXIS AI overviewβone paragraph
- DSO strategic rationale
- Expected benefits for their region
Their Role in Rollout (10 min)
- Location readiness assessment support
- Champion identification and support
- Go-live attendance (if required)
- Weekly check-in facilitation
Timeline and Their Locations (5 min)
- Wave assignments for their locations
- Key dates and milestones
- Buffer periods and flexibility
What to Tell Office Managers (5 min)
- Key messages to cascade
- Common questions to anticipate
- How to handle staff concerns
Escalation and Support (5 min)
- When to escalate to central team
- Who to contact for what
- Regular check-in schedule with central team
Regional Manager Toolkit
β One-page initiative summary for office managers β FAQ document for staff questions β Location assessment template (if not completed centrally) β Champion nomination form β Weekly status report template
Staff Resistance Framework for Multi-Location Dynamics
Common Resistance Patterns at Scale
| Pattern | Manifestation | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| "Other locations are doing fine without this" | Staff compare to non-deployed locations | Deploy in waves to minimize this window; emphasize portfolio-wide commitment |
| "Corporate is forcing this on us" | Perception of top-down mandate | Involve local champions; frame as clinical improvement, not mandate |
| "We're guinea pigs" | Wave 1 locations feel tested | Position as trusted partners; offer extra support |
| "Why are we last?" | Wave 3 locations feel neglected | Communicate that later waves benefit from earlier learnings; thank them for patience |
| Cross-location grumbling | Staff at different locations share frustrations | Monitor, address quickly; share success stories broadly |
Resistance Response Protocol
- Local champion addresses first: Peer-to-peer credibility
- Office manager reinforces: Management support
- Regional manager intervenes if needed: Authority and broader context
- Central team escalates if systemic: Policy or training adjustments
Internal Marketing
Initiative Naming π£
Recommended: Give the rollout a memorable internal name that conveys positivity
Examples:
- "Project ClearView" (emphasizes diagnostic clarity)
- "AI Advantage Initiative"
- "SmartScan Rollout"
Avoid: Generic names like "DEXIS Implementation" or names that emphasize change/disruption
Momentum-Building Tactics
| Tactic | Timing | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| CEO/CDO video announcement | Week 1 | CEO/CDO |
| "Meet the AI" preview session (all-hands or regional) | Week 2 | Clinical leader |
| Champion spotlight emails | Ongoing | Internal comms |
| Wave 1 success stories | Post-Wave 1 | Marketing/Comms |
| "First 100 AI-assisted diagnoses" celebration | Post-Wave 1 | Regional managers |
| Monthly leaderboard (optionalβuse carefully) | Monthly | VP Ops |
| Full deployment celebration | Final wave | CEO |
Celebrating Milestones
β Wave 1 go-live: Recognize pilot locations and champions β 50% deployment: All-hands update, share early results β Full deployment: Company-wide announcement, champion recognition β ROI milestone: Quantified results communication
8. Go-Live Day Runbook
Standardized Go-Live Checklist (Every Location)
Pre-Go-Live (Day Before)
| Time | Task | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-24h | Confirm all training complete (attestations collected) | Champion | β |
| T-24h | Verify system configuration matches standard template | IT | β |
| T-24h | Confirm PMS integration validated | IT | β |
| T-24h | Verify imaging system connectivity | IT | β |
| T-24h | Test AI analysis on 3 sample images | Provider | β |
| T-24h | Print and distribute Day 1 cheat sheets | Champion | β |
| T-24h | Brief all staff on go-live plan | Champion | β |
| T-24h | Confirm vendor support contact and availability | IT | β |
| T-24h | π΅ Notify Envista of go-live (if heightened support requested) | IT | β |
Go-Live Day: Hour-by-Hour Schedule
| Time | Activity | Owner | Support |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7:00 AM | Champion arrives, system check | Champion | IT (remote) |
| 7:15 AM | Final huddle with clinical team (10 min) | Champion | |
| 7:30 AM | First patient with AI-assisted imaging | Provider | Champion observes |
| 8:00 AM | Check-in: First patient processed, any issues? | Champion | Regional (remote) |
| 9:00 AM | Check-in: First 2β3 patients processed | Champion | Regional (remote) |
| 10:00 AM | Morning progress report to central team | Champion | |
| 12:00 PM | Midday huddle: Issues, questions, adjustments | Champion | Provider |
| 2:00 PM | Afternoon check-in | Champion | Regional (remote) |
| 4:00 PM | End of day debrief | Champion | Provider |
| 4:30 PM | Day 1 report submitted to central team | Champion |
Who Needs to Be Available
| Role | Requirement | Contact Method |
|---|---|---|
| Location Champion | On-site all day | In-person |
| Regional Manager | On-call; on-site for Wave 1 only | Phone/video |
| Central IT | On-call all day | Slack/Teams + phone |
| Central Operations | On-call all day | Phone/video |
| π΅ Envista Support | On-call; elevated support for Wave 1 | Support hotline |
Known Gotchas and First-Day Troubleshooting β οΈ
| Issue | Likely Cause | Fix | Time to Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI analysis not triggering | DEXIS service not running | Restart DEXIS application; verify service status | 5 min |
| Analysis extremely slow | Network bandwidth issue | Check network speed; prioritize imaging traffic | 15β30 min |
| Overlay not displaying | Display settings incorrect | Adjust view settings; check monitor resolution | 5 min |
| Findings not exporting to PMS | Integration configuration | Verify API connection; re-authenticate | 15 min |
| "License not found" error | Licensing not activated | Contact Envista support π΅ | 15β60 min |
| Inconsistent patient matching | Patient ID mismatch | Manual patient link; escalate for permanent fix | 5 min per patient |
| Provider override not saving | Documentation setting | Adjust note export settings | 10 min |
| Staff forgot workflow | Normal learning curve | Reference cheat sheet; champion provides guidance | 2 min |
Escalation Tiers
| Tier | Who | When to Engage | Expected Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Location Champion | Any question or minor issue | Immediate |
| Tier 2 | Regional Manager | Issue not resolved in 15 min; staff escalation | Within 15 min |
| Tier 3 | Central IT | Technical issue not resolved at Tier 2 | Within 30 min |
| Tier 4 | π΅ Envista Support | System-level issue; central IT cannot resolve | Per SLA (target: 1 hour) |
Patient Communication Script
For Patient-Facing AI Visuals
Introducing AI to Patients (Provider Script):
"Today I'm using some advanced imaging technology that helps me identify potential areas of concern in your X-rays. You might notice colored highlights on the imagesβthose are areas the system has flagged for me to review closely. I want to be clear: I'm the one making all the diagnostic decisions, but this technology helps ensure I don't miss anything. Do you have any questions about that?"
If Patient Asks Questions:
| Patient Question | Recommended Response |
|---|---|
| "Is a robot diagnosing me?" | "Not at allβI'm making all the diagnoses. This is a tool that helps me catch things that might be easy to miss. Think of it like spell-check for X-rays." |
| "Is this safe?" | "Absolutely. It analyzes the same X-rays we've always taken. There's no additional radiation or procedures." |
| "How accurate is it?" | "It's very good at highlighting areas that need attention, but I always apply my clinical judgment. It's one of many tools I use." |
| "Do I have a choice?" | "The AI is simply analyzing images we're already taking. If you'd prefer not to see the AI overlay, I can discuss your X-rays without it." |
First-Week Daily Check-In Protocol
Location Champion β Central Team
Daily Report (Submit by 5 PM local time)
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Patients imaged with AI today: | [Number] |
| Issues encountered: | [List or "None"] |
| Issues resolved: | [List] |
| Issues escalated: | [List] |
| Staff feedback themes: | [Summary] |
| Provider feedback themes: | [Summary] |
| Patient feedback: | [Summary] |
| Confidence level (1β10): | [Score] |
| Support needed tomorrow: | [Specific requests] |
Central Team β Champion
Daily Check-In Call (15 min, scheduled time)
- Review submitted report
- Address outstanding issues
- Provide encouragement and guidance
- Update on any system-wide learnings
- Confirm next day's plan
9. Post-Launch Optimization (Weeks 4β8)
Weekly Metrics Review Cadence
Metrics to Track (Per Location)
| Metric | Source | Target | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI utilization rate | DEXIS dashboard | >90% of exams | <70% |
| Provider adoption rate | DEXIS dashboard | 100% of providers using | Any provider at 0% |
| Average analysis time | DEXIS dashboard | <5 seconds | >15 seconds |
| System uptime | IT monitoring | >99% | <95% |
| Support tickets | Helpdesk | Decreasing trend | Increasing after Week 2 |
| Case acceptance rate | PMS | Improving vs. baseline | Declining vs. baseline |
| Patient complaints | Complaint log | Zero AI-related | Any AI-related complaints |
Weekly Review Meeting (30 Minutes)
Attendees: Central operations lead, clinical lead, IT lead Frequency: Weekly (Weeks 1β8); bi-weekly thereafter
Agenda:
- Metrics review: Red/yellow/green by location (5 min)
- Issue triage: Outstanding issues and resolution status (10 min)
- Feedback synthesis: Themes from champions (5 min)
- Process adjustments: Any workflow refinements (5 min)
- Next week focus: Priorities and action items (5 min)
30-Day Checkpoint
What "Good" Looks Like
| Indicator | Target at 30 Days |
|---|---|
| AI utilization | >95% of eligible exams |
| Provider adoption | 100% of providers actively using |
| Support tickets | <5 open tickets across all deployed locations |
| Staff satisfaction | Average β₯3.5/5 on pulse survey |
| Workflow integration | No significant patient flow delays |
| Case acceptance | Stable or improving vs. baseline |
| Patient feedback | Net positive; no recurring complaints |
Red Flags at 30 Days β οΈ
| Red Flag | Action Required |
|---|---|
| Utilization <70% | Champion intervention; identify barriers |
| Any provider not using | Direct outreach from CDO |
| Open tickets increasing | Root cause analysis; additional training |
| Staff satisfaction <3/5 | Focus groups; specific concern addressing |
| Case acceptance declining | Clinical workflow review; provider coaching |
| Patient complaints | Immediate review; communication adjustments |
60-Day Checkpoint
ROI Assessment Framework
Compare to Baseline Metrics Captured Pre-Launch
| Metric | Baseline | 60-Day | Delta | ROI Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case acceptance rate | [%] | [%] | [+/- %] | Revenue impact |
| Radiographic findings per patient | [#] | [#] | [+/- #] | Diagnostic thoroughness |
| Time to treatment presentation | [min] | [min] | [+/- min] | Efficiency impact |
| Diagnostic re-treatment rate | [%] | [%] | [+/- %] | Quality impact |
| Claim denial rate (dx codes) | [%] | [%] | [+/- %] | Revenue cycle impact |
| Provider interpretation time | [min] | [min] | [+/- min] | Provider efficiency |
ROI Calculation Framework
Monthly Revenue Impact =
(Case Acceptance Improvement % Γ Average Case Value Γ Monthly Patient Volume)
+ (Denied Claims Reduction Γ Average Claim Value)
- (Additional Operating Costs, if any)
Annual ROI = (12 Γ Monthly Revenue Impact) / Total Implementation Investment
Staff Feedback Collection
5-Question Pulse Survey (Monthly)
Deploy to all staff at deployed locations
How confident do you feel using DEXIS AI in your daily work? (1 = Not confident β 5 = Very confident)
How has DEXIS AI impacted your workflow? (1 = Made it worse β 5 = Improved significantly)
How well does DEXIS AI integrate with your other systems? (1 = Poorly β 5 = Seamlessly)
How likely are you to recommend DEXIS AI to a colleague? (1 = Not likely β 5 = Highly likely)
What one thing would most improve your experience with DEXIS AI? (Open text)
Survey Administration
- Deploy via email on the first Monday of each month
- Close survey after 5 business days
- Analyze results and share summary with regional managers within 1 week
- Track trends over time; investigate any location with declining scores
Workflow Refinements: Common Post-Launch Adjustments
| Adjustment | When to Consider | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Adjust AI sensitivity | Providers report excessive false positives/negatives | Configuration change (test before production) |
| Modify overlay display | Providers want more/less visual detail | Per-provider customization (within permitted range) |
| Streamline documentation | Export to notes is clunky | Template adjustment; work with vendor π΅ |
| Add peer review workflow | CDO wants quality oversight | Configure secondary review trigger |
| Adjust patient communication | Patients confused by AI mention | Update scripts; additional staff training |
| Reallocate champion time | Champion overloaded with support requests | Add secondary champion or reduce other duties |
Centralized Dashboard Structure
Location-Level Dashboard (Accessible to Champions, Office Managers, Regional Managers)
| Metric | Display | Update Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| AI utilization rate | Percentage, trend chart | Real-time |
| Exams analyzed today | Count | Real-time |
| Average analysis time | Seconds | Daily |
| Open support tickets | Count, list | Real-time |
| Training completion | Percentage | Real-time |
| Staff survey average | Score | Monthly |
Portfolio-Level Dashboard (Accessible to C-Suite, VP Ops)
| Metric | Display | Update Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment progress | Locations live / Total locations | Real-time |
| Portfolio utilization rate | Percentage, by-location breakdown | Daily |
| Portfolio case acceptance delta | Percentage change vs. baseline | Weekly |
| Open tickets (all locations) | Count, by severity | Real-time |
| Red/yellow/green status | Heatmap | Weekly |
| ROI tracking | Dollar estimate | Monthly |
Quarterly Business Review Framework
QBR Agenda (90 Minutes)
Attendees: C-suite, regional managers, clinical leadership, IT
Executive Summary (10 min)
- Deployment status: Locations live, wave progress
- Key wins and challenges
- ROI snapshot
Performance Review (20 min)
- Portfolio-wide metrics vs. targets
- Location-level performance: Top performers and laggards
- Trend analysis: Improving, stable, declining
Clinical Impact Assessment (15 min)
- CDO presentation: Clinical quality observations
- Provider adoption and feedback themes
- Patient impact summary
Operational Review (15 min)
- IT: System stability, integration performance
- Operations: Workflow impact, efficiency gains/losses
- Support: Ticket volume, common issues
Financial Review (15 min)
- Budget vs. actual: Implementation costs
- ROI progress: Revenue impact tracking
- Forecast: Expected full-year impact
Roadmap and Optimization (10 min)
- Upcoming enhancements from vendor π΅
- Planned process improvements
- Next quarter priorities
Decisions Needed (5 min) π£
- Open items requiring executive decision
- Resource requests
10. Centralized vs. Localized Decision Framework
| Decision Area | Standardize Centrally | Allow Local Discretion | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI sensitivity settings | β | Consistency in diagnostic presentation | |
| Pathology categories enabled | β | Complete diagnostic picture portfolio-wide | |
| Documentation template | β | Consistent clinical notes and compliance | |
| User permission levels/RBAC | β | Security consistency | |
| Training content | β | Quality assurance | |
| Reporting structure | β | Comparable metrics across locations | |
| Confidence score display | β | Provider preference | |
| Audio/visual cues | β | Workflow preference | |
| Patient-facing overlay display | β | Provider judgment | |
| Secondary review triggers | β | Regional/specialty variation | |
| Champion selection | β | Local knowledge required | |
| Training scheduling | β | Local logistics | |
| Go-live day of week | β | Patient volume management |
11. Risk Register
| Risk | Likelihood (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | Risk Score | Mitigation Strategy | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β οΈ Provider resistance stalls adoption | 3 | 4 | 12 | Champion-led training; CDO engagement; address concerns directly | CDO |
| Network issues disrupt AI analysis | 2 | 4 | 8 | Pre-deployment network assessment; bandwidth upgrades; offline fallback workflow | IT |
| Integration failures delay go-live | 3 | 3 | 9 | Thorough test environment validation; buffer time in schedule; vendor escalation path | IT |
| Patient pushback on AI | 2 | 3 | 6 | Staff communication training; patient-friendly scripts; transparency | Champions |
| Champion turnover mid-rollout | 2 | 4 | 8 | Identify backup champions; champion succession plan | Regional Manager |
| Vendor support capacity exceeded | 2 | 3 | 6 | Establish dedicated enterprise support contact; SLA enforcement | VP Ops |
| β οΈ Wave 1 failure delays entire rollout | 2 | 5 | 10 | Thorough pilot selection; extended stabilization period; clear rollback plan | VP Ops |
| Budget overrun from unexpected costs | 2 | 3 | 6 | Contingency budget (10%); |
AI-generated implementation guide based on public vendor information. Verify specifics directly with DEXIS / Envista.