Matisse AI
Step-by-step implementation guide — pre-implementation checklist, onboarding, staff training, go-live runbook, and ROI tracking.
Matisse AI — Implementation Playbook (DSO)
Matisse AI Implementation Playbook
3D Printing & Digital Workflow Optimization for Dental Service Organizations
1. Executive Summary
What Matisse AI Does
Matisse AI is an intelligent digital workflow platform that streamlines 3D printing operations for dental applications, automating print job optimization, material management, and production scheduling while integrating quality control checkpoints throughout the digital dentistry workflow. The platform uses machine learning to optimize print orientations, support structures, and nesting configurations while providing real-time production analytics across your 3D printing fleet.
Why DSOs Specifically Benefit
DSOs operating at scale gain compounding advantages from Matisse AI that single practices cannot replicate:
- Production Consolidation: Centralized or hub-and-spoke 3D printing operations become viable when intelligent scheduling eliminates the chaos of managing multiple printers across locations
- Data Aggregation for Predictive Operations: With 15–50 locations generating print jobs, Matisse AI's machine learning models improve exponentially—your collective case data trains smarter optimization algorithms than any single practice could achieve
- Standardization Without Rigidity: Enforce consistent quality standards for surgical guides, aligners, dentures, and models while allowing location-specific production priorities
- Material Cost Arbitrage: Aggregate consumption data enables better vendor negotiations and just-in-time inventory management across your network
- Labor Efficiency at Scale: Reduce the specialized labor required per location by centralizing technical oversight while distributing production capacity
Expected Timeline: Decision to Full Deployment
| Phase | Timeline | Milestone |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Implementation | Weeks 1–2 | Infrastructure audit complete, pilot locations selected |
| Wave 1 Pilot | Weeks 3–6 | 2–3 locations live, initial optimization data collected |
| Wave 2 Expansion | Weeks 7–12 | Next 5–8 locations deployed |
| Wave 3 Full Rollout | Weeks 13–20 | All remaining locations live |
| Optimization Phase | Weeks 21–28 | Cross-network analytics active, ROI validation complete |
Total Timeline: 5–7 months for a 30-location DSO, with meaningful ROI data available by month 4.
2. Pre-Implementation Checklist (Weeks 1–2)
Technical Requirements
Hardware Requirements per Location
☐ 3D printer(s) with network connectivity (WiFi or Ethernet) ☐ Dedicated workstation: Intel i5/AMD Ryzen 5 or higher, 16GB RAM minimum, 512GB SSD ☐ Compatible 3D printer models (verify with Matisse AI compatibility list) ☐ Intraoral scanner with STL/PLY/OBJ export capability ☐ Post-processing equipment with tracking capability (if applicable)
Network Requirements
☐ Minimum 50 Mbps upload/download per location (100 Mbps recommended) ☐ Static IP or DDNS capability for printer fleet management ☐ Ports 443, 8443, and 3000 open for cloud communication ☐ VPN compatibility if using centralized hosting model ⚠️ Latency under 100ms to Matisse AI cloud servers—test from each location
Software Requirements
☐ Windows 10/11 Pro or macOS 12+ on workstations ☐ Chrome, Edge, or Firefox (latest versions) for web interface ☐ Practice management system API access enabled ☐ DICOM viewer for CT/CBCT integration (if applicable)
Vendor Onboarding Steps
| Step | Owner | Timeline | Vendor Contact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔵 Execute enterprise licensing agreement | Legal/Procurement | Day 1–3 | Enterprise Sales |
| 🔵 Receive enterprise admin credentials | Central IT | Day 3–5 | Implementation Manager |
| 🔵 Schedule kickoff call | Project Lead | Day 5 | Customer Success Manager |
| 🔵 Assign dedicated implementation specialist | Matisse AI | Day 5 | Account Executive |
| 🔵 Obtain API documentation | Central IT | Day 5–7 | Technical Support |
| 🔵 Schedule technical architecture review | Central IT + Matisse | Day 7–10 | Solutions Architect |
Key Vendor Contacts to Establish
☐ Enterprise Account Executive: Strategic escalations, contract modifications ☐ Implementation Manager: Deployment coordination, timeline management ☐ Technical Support Tier 2: Integration troubleshooting, API issues ☐ Customer Success Manager: Adoption metrics, optimization recommendations
Data/Access Prerequisites
☐ PMS API credentials for each location (read access minimum; write access for case status sync) ☐ Scanner software export settings configured for automated STL delivery ☐ Historical case data export from existing workflow tools (past 12 months recommended) ☐ Printer manufacturer portal credentials for fleet integration ☐ Cloud storage access for file staging (if using external storage) ☐ Active Directory or identity provider credentials for SSO configuration
Enterprise-Level Requirements
Network Standards Across Locations
🟣 ☐ Decision: Centralized hosting vs. location-level hosting
- Centralized: Single cloud instance, all locations connect remotely. Better for standardization, harder if locations have inconsistent connectivity.
- Location-Level: Each location runs local instance with cloud sync. Better resilience, more configuration overhead.
- Recommended for 15–50 locations: Centralized hosting with local caching for production continuity during outages
☐ Standardize network topology documentation across all locations ☐ Verify firewall rules are consistent (or can be made consistent) across locations ⚠️ ☐ Audit locations with legacy networking equipment—these will cause delays
Single Sign-On (SSO) Configuration
☐ SAML 2.0 or OAuth 2.0 compatibility verification 🔵 ☐ Provide identity provider metadata to Matisse AI ☐ Role-based access control (RBAC) matrix defined:
- Super Admin: Central IT, CDO
- Regional Admin: Regional managers
- Location Admin: Office managers
- Production User: Lab techs, dental assistants
- View Only: Providers (if not directly managing prints)
Centralized Credentialing
☐ Map organizational hierarchy in Matisse AI admin console ☐ Create location groups aligned with regional structure ☐ Define permission inheritance rules (what regional admins can modify vs. view)
Stakeholder Alignment Map
| Stakeholder | Role in Implementation | Inform (I) / Approve (A) / Execute (E) | Key Concerns to Address |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board/Investors | Strategic oversight | I | ROI, competitive positioning, capital allocation |
| CEO | Executive sponsor | A | Timeline, resource commitment, risk exposure |
| CDO | Clinical governance | A | Clinical quality, workflow impact, provider adoption |
| VP Operations | Program owner | A + E | Execution complexity, location readiness, staff impact |
| CFO | Budget approval | A | Capital vs. OpEx, ROI timeline, vendor terms |
| VP IT/CIO | Technical approval | A + E | Security, integration, infrastructure |
| Regional Managers | Cascade execution | E + I | Location-specific challenges, staff capacity |
| Office Managers | Local implementation | E | Day-to-day workflow changes, training burden |
| Lead Providers | Clinical validation | I + E | Workflow disruption, quality assurance |
| Lab Technicians | End users | E | Tool usability, job impact concerns |
Alignment Meeting Cadence
🟣 ☐ Week 1: Executive steering committee kickoff (CEO, CDO, VP Ops, CFO, CIO) ☐ Week 1: Regional manager briefing session ☐ Week 2: Location manager notification and Q&A ☐ Ongoing: Weekly executive sponsor update (15 minutes) ☐ Ongoing: Bi-weekly regional manager syncs
Baseline Metrics to Capture BEFORE Go-Live
⚠️ Critical: Without baseline metrics, ROI measurement is impossible. Capture these across ALL locations using standardized definitions.
Production Efficiency Metrics
| Metric | Definition | How to Capture | Standardization Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Print jobs per day | Total completed prints per 24-hour period | Printer logs or manual tally | Count by location and aggregate |
| Print failure rate | Failed prints / total print attempts | Manual log or printer software | Define "failure" consistently (partial, total, post-cure) |
| Material waste % | Wasted resin (mL) / total resin used | Weight-based tracking or estimation | Train all locations on measurement method |
| Average job setup time | Time from STL receipt to print start | Time-motion study (sample 20 jobs/location) | Exclude atypical cases |
| Post-processing time | Time from print complete to case-ready | Time-motion study | Include wash, cure, finishing |
Operational Metrics
| Metric | Definition | How to Capture | Standardization Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case turnaround time | Days from impression/scan to delivery | PMS case tracking | Define start/end points identically |
| Remake rate | Reprints required / total cases | Case tracking | Distinguish clinically-driven vs. print-driven remakes |
| Outsourced case volume | Cases sent to external labs | Lab invoice data | Include reason codes |
| Equipment downtime | Hours printer unavailable / total hours | Maintenance logs | Include scheduled and unscheduled |
Financial Metrics
| Metric | Definition | How to Capture | Standardization Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material cost per case | Total material spend / cases produced | Invoice reconciliation | Allocate shared materials consistently |
| Labor cost per case | Tech labor hours × rate / cases | Payroll + production data | Include only production-related time |
| External lab spend | Monthly outsourcing costs | AP records | Segment by case type |
| Equipment cost per case | Depreciation + maintenance / cases | Asset tracking | Standardize depreciation method |
Standardization Protocol for Baseline Metrics
🟣 ☐ Approve standardized metric definitions document ☐ Distribute measurement protocols to all location managers ☐ Assign regional managers to audit 2 locations each for measurement consistency ☐ Collect 4 weeks of baseline data minimum before Wave 1 go-live ⚠️ ☐ Reconcile any locations using different definitions—flag for manual baseline adjustment
3. Location Readiness Assessment
Readiness Scoring Framework
Score each location on the following factors (1–5 scale). Composite score determines rollout wave assignment.
Factor 1: IT Infrastructure Maturity (Weight: 25%)
| Score | Network Speed | Hardware Age | PMS Version | Overall IT Health |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 100+ Mbps, stable | < 2 years | Current version | Dedicated IT support |
| 4 | 75–100 Mbps, stable | 2–3 years | 1 version behind | Shared IT support |
| 3 | 50–75 Mbps, occasional issues | 3–4 years | 2 versions behind | Ad-hoc IT support |
| 2 | 25–50 Mbps, frequent issues | 4–5 years | 3+ versions behind | Minimal IT support |
| 1 | < 25 Mbps, unreliable | 5+ years | Unsupported version | No IT support |
Assessment Method: ☐ Central IT runs network speed tests (3 tests at different times of day) ☐ Inventory hardware purchase dates from asset management ☐ Verify PMS version from vendor portal ☐ Survey location manager on IT support experience
Factor 2: Staff Tenure and Adaptability (Weight: 20%)
| Score | Average Staff Tenure | Turnover Rate (Annual) | Tech Comfort | Prior Tech Adoption |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5+ years | < 10% | Actively seeks tech | Led prior implementations |
| 4 | 3–5 years | 10–20% | Comfortable with tech | Participated in prior implementations |
| 3 | 2–3 years | 20–30% | Neutral toward tech | Used current systems adequately |
| 2 | 1–2 years | 30–40% | Tech-resistant | Struggled with prior changes |
| 1 | < 1 year | 40%+ | Actively avoids tech | Prior implementations failed |
Assessment Method: ☐ Pull tenure data from HR system ☐ Calculate 12-month turnover from HR records ☐ Regional manager rates tech comfort (1–5) based on observation ☐ Review prior technology rollout notes if available
Factor 3: Patient Volume (Weight: 20%)
| Score | Monthly Patient Volume | Production Volume | Impact Potential | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1,000+ | 200+ cases/month | Highest impact | Highest risk |
| 4 | 750–1,000 | 150–200 cases | High impact | High risk |
| 3 | 500–750 | 100–150 cases | Moderate impact | Moderate risk |
| 2 | 250–500 | 50–100 cases | Lower impact | Lower risk |
| 1 | < 250 | < 50 cases | Minimal impact | Minimal risk |
Assessment Method: ☐ Pull patient visit counts from PMS ☐ Estimate 3D printing case volume from lab logs or outsourcing invoices ☐ Note: High volume locations are NOT necessarily best for Wave 1—balance impact with risk
Factor 4: Existing Tech Stack Compatibility (Weight: 20%)
| Score | PMS Compatibility | Scanner Integration | Printer Fleet | Other Digital Tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Native integration | Direct API available | All Matisse-certified | Digital workflow mature |
| 4 | Documented integration | Export automation | Most certified | Moderate digital adoption |
| 3 | Custom integration needed | Manual export | Some certified | Basic digital tools |
| 2 | Complex integration | Limited export options | Few certified | Minimal digital |
| 1 | No integration path | No export | None certified | Paper-based workflows |
Assessment Method: 🔵 ☐ Provide tech stack inventory to Matisse AI for compatibility scoring ☐ Verify scanner models and software versions ☐ Audit 3D printer models against certification list ☐ Survey digital workflow maturity with office manager
Factor 5: Local Champion Availability (Weight: 15%)
| Score | Champion Profile | Availability | Authority | Motivation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Tech-forward provider or manager | Dedicated implementation time | Can make local decisions | Actively requested tool |
| 4 | Engaged manager | Partial dedicated time | Influences local decisions | Supportive of initiative |
| 3 | Capable staff member | Limited additional time | Informal influence | Neutral but willing |
| 2 | Reluctant participant | No dedicated time | Limited influence | Compliant but unenthusiastic |
| 1 | No candidate identified | No capacity | No authority | Resistant |
Assessment Method: ☐ Regional managers nominate champion candidates ☐ Interview candidates for willingness and capacity ☐ Verify office manager support for champion role ☐ Assess whether champion has production floor credibility
Scoring Calculation
Composite Score = (IT × 0.25) + (Staff × 0.20) + (Volume × 0.20) + (TechStack × 0.20) + (Champion × 0.15)
| Composite Score | Rollout Wave Recommendation |
|---|---|
| 4.0–5.0 | Wave 1 Pilot Candidate |
| 3.0–3.9 | Wave 2 |
| 2.0–2.9 | Wave 3 |
| < 2.0 | Remediation Required Before Deployment |
Rollout Sequence Recommendation
Wave 1 Selection Criteria (2–3 Locations)
Select locations with: ☐ Composite score 4.0+ ☐ At least one location in each major region (for geographic coverage) ☐ At least one high-volume and one moderate-volume location (for diverse testing) ☐ Strong local champion identified and committed ☐ Representative PMS/scanner mix (avoid Wave 1 being all Dentrix if portfolio is mixed) ⚠️ Avoid: Locations with new office managers (< 6 months tenure) or active renovation/relocation
Wave 2 Selection Criteria (5–8 Locations)
Select locations with: ☐ Composite score 3.0–3.9 ☐ No critical infrastructure remediation required ☐ Champion identified (even if less experienced than Wave 1) ☐ Geographic clustering with Wave 1 sites (enables peer support)
Wave 3 Selection Criteria (Remaining Locations)
☐ All remaining locations with score 2.0+ ☐ Locations requiring remediation—schedule remediation during Waves 1–2
Remediation Tracking
For locations scoring < 2.0:
| Location | Deficiency | Remediation Action | Owner | Target Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Location] | Network speed | ISP upgrade | Regional + IT | [Date] |
| [Location] | Hardware age | Workstation replacement | IT + Finance | [Date] |
| [Location] | No champion | Recruit/hire | Regional Manager | [Date] |
4. Rollout Strategy
Wave Structure Recommendation
Wave 1: Pilot (Weeks 3–6)
- Locations: 2–3 sites
- Duration: 4 weeks
- Objective: Validate integration, refine training materials, identify configuration issues, establish baseline performance data under Matisse AI
Wave 2: Early Majority (Weeks 7–12)
- Locations: 5–8 sites
- Duration: 6 weeks (2 cohorts of 3–4 locations if needed)
- Objective: Scale deployment, stress-test support model, validate train-the-trainer approach
Wave 3: Full Rollout (Weeks 13–20)
- Locations: Remaining sites
- Duration: 8 weeks (cohorts of 5–7 locations)
- Objective: Complete deployment, shift to operational mode
Detailed Wave 1 Pilot Plan
Week 3: Pre-Pilot Preparation
☐ Confirm Wave 1 locations and champions (Day 1) 🔵 ☐ Matisse AI technical setup for pilot locations (Days 1–3) ☐ Install and configure workstations (Days 2–4) ☐ Complete champion training—intensive 2-day program (Days 3–4) ⚠️ ☐ Verify network connectivity and test print job submission (Day 5) ☐ Configure printer fleet in Matisse AI (Days 4–5) ☐ Run test prints with sample files (Day 5)
Week 4: Pilot Go-Live
☐ Go-live Day 1 (see Go-Live Day Runbook, Section 8) ☐ On-site support present at each pilot location (Days 1–2) ☐ Daily check-in calls with champions (Days 1–5) ☐ Issue tracking and resolution (ongoing) 🔵 ☐ Matisse AI support on standby for escalations
Week 5: Pilot Stabilization
☐ Transition to virtual support only ☐ Daily check-ins shift to 3x weekly ☐ Begin collecting performance metrics ☐ Gather staff feedback (mid-pilot pulse survey) ☐ Document workflow adjustments and workarounds
Week 6: Pilot Evaluation
☐ Compile pilot performance data ☐ Conduct champion debrief sessions ☐ Update training materials based on pilot learnings ☐ Finalize configuration template for Wave 2 🟣 ☐ Go/No-Go decision for Wave 2
Go/No-Go Criteria
Criteria to Advance from Wave 1 to Wave 2
| Criterion | Threshold | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| System uptime | > 98% | Matisse AI monitoring |
| Print job success rate | > 90% | Production logs |
| Champion confidence score | > 3.5/5 | Champion self-assessment |
| Staff training completion | 100% | Training tracking |
| Critical issues resolved | All P1 issues closed | Issue tracker |
| User adoption | > 80% of jobs through Matisse | Usage analytics |
🟣 ☐ VP Operations + CDO sign-off required to proceed to Wave 2 ⚠️ If any criterion not met, implement remediation plan before proceeding (add 1–2 weeks)
Criteria to Advance from Wave 2 to Wave 3
| Criterion | Threshold | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| System uptime | > 99% | Matisse AI monitoring |
| Print job success rate | > 92% | Production logs |
| Train-the-trainer success | All location staff trained | Completion tracking |
| Average setup time reduction | > 15% vs. baseline | Time-motion comparison |
| Support ticket volume | Declining week-over-week | Help desk data |
Timeline with Buffers
| Wave | Target Start | Target End | Buffer for Learnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wave 1 | Week 3 | Week 6 | 1 week (Week 7) |
| Wave 2 | Week 8 | Week 12 | 1 week (Week 13) |
| Wave 3 | Week 14 | Week 20 | Ongoing optimization |
Rollback Plan
Triggers for Rollback Consideration
- System uptime < 90% for 48+ hours
- Print failure rate > 30% attributable to Matisse AI
- Data integrity issues (missing cases, corrupted files)
- Security incident or breach
- Provider refusal rate > 25%
Rollback Procedure
- Pause: Stop new location deployments immediately
- Assess: Determine if issue is systemic or location-specific
- Communicate: Brief executive sponsor, regional managers, and affected locations
- Isolate: If location-specific, quarantine that location; others continue
- Revert: If systemic, instruct all locations to revert to manual workflow
- Preserve: Maintain Matisse AI access for troubleshooting (read-only)
- Resolve: Work with vendor on root cause; do not resume until resolved
- Re-validate: Repeat Wave 1 process for affected locations before continuing
⚠️ Rollback Decision Authority: VP Operations can pause; CEO approval required for full rollback
5. Configuration & Integration (Weeks 2–3)
Practice Management System Integration
Dentrix Enterprise Integration
Prerequisites: ☐ Dentrix Enterprise version 8.0 or later ☐ API access enabled by Dentrix (contact Dentrix support) ☐ Matisse AI Dentrix connector license activated
Step-by-Step Integration:
- 🔵 ☐ Obtain Dentrix API credentials from vendor support (2–3 business days)
- ☐ In Matisse AI Admin Console, navigate to Integrations → PMS
- ☐ Select "Dentrix Enterprise" from dropdown
- ☐ Enter API endpoint URL (provided by Dentrix)
- ☐ Enter authentication credentials
- ☐ Configure data sync options:
- ☐ Patient demographics: Read-only
- ☐ Appointment data: Read-only
- ☐ Case/procedure data: Read-write (for status updates)
- ☐ Provider information: Read-only
- ⚠️ ☐ Test connection—verify with 3 sample patient lookups
- ☐ Configure auto-refresh interval (recommended: every 15 minutes)
- ☐ Enable event webhooks for real-time case status sync
- ☐ Document integration settings for enterprise configuration template
Estimated Time: 2–4 hours per location (can be parallelized with central IT)
Eaglesoft Integration
Prerequisites: ☐ Eaglesoft version 21 or later ☐ Eaglesoft Online enabled for cloud connectivity ☐ Practice-level admin credentials
Step-by-Step Integration:
- 🔵 ☐ Request Eaglesoft API access through Patterson Dental (3–5 business days)
- ☐ Verify Eaglesoft Online is active and syncing
- ☐ In Matisse AI Admin Console, navigate to Integrations → PMS
- ☐ Select "Eaglesoft" from dropdown
- ☐ Enter practice ID and API key
- ☐ Map field mappings:
- ☐ Patient ID field
- ☐ Procedure code field (CDT codes)
- ☐ Provider ID field
- ⚠️ ☐ Test connection with read operation
- ☐ Configure write-back settings for case status updates
- ☐ Set sync frequency (recommended: every 10 minutes for Eaglesoft)
- ☐ Test end-to-end: create test case in Eaglesoft, verify appears in Matisse AI
Estimated Time: 3–5 hours per location
Open Dental Integration
Prerequisites: ☐ Open Dental version 22.1 or later ☐ Open Dental API access enabled (Open Dental API subscription required) ☐ Static IP or DDNS configured (for webhook delivery)
Step-by-Step Integration:
- ☐ In Open Dental, navigate to Setup → Program Links → Matisse AI
- ☐ Enable the Matisse AI program link
- ☐ Generate API key in Open Dental (Setup → Security → API)
- ☐ In Matisse AI Admin Console, navigate to Integrations → PMS
- ☐ Select "Open Dental" from dropdown
- ☐ Enter practice database name and API key
- ☐ Configure OAuth (if using Open Dental Cloud)
- ☐ Map procedure codes to Matisse AI case types:
- ☐ Surgical guides (D6190, D6191)
- ☐ Dentures (D5110–D5140)
- ☐ Models (D9999 custom codes)
- ⚠️ ☐ Test bidirectional sync
- ☐ Configure attachment storage (link printed case images back to patient record)
Estimated Time: 2–3 hours per location (Open Dental typically easiest)
Imaging and Scanner Integration
Intraoral Scanner Integration (3Shape, iTero, Medit)
3Shape TRIOS:
- ☐ Enable TRIOS "Send to Lab" functionality
- ☐ Configure Matisse AI as a destination in TRIOS Design Studio
- 🔵 ☐ Obtain 3Shape Communicate credentials if using cloud transfer
- ☐ Set default export format: STL (binary)
- ☐ Configure automatic case creation in Matisse AI upon receipt
- ⚠️ ☐ Test with sample scan—verify geometry integrity
iTero:
- ☐ In iTero Element, navigate to Settings → Export
- ☐ Add Matisse AI as export destination
- ☐ Configure MyiTero cloud sync if using cloud pathway
- ☐ Set export format: STL
- ☐ Enable automatic naming convention matching Matisse AI requirements
- ☐ Test export and verify file appears in Matisse AI queue
Medit:
- ☐ In Medit Link, configure Matisse AI as connected application
- ☐ Enable "Design Service" workflow to Matisse AI
- ☐ Set export parameters (STL, medium resolution minimum)
- ☐ Configure case metadata to transfer with file
- ☐ Test integration with sample scan
Estimated Time: 1–2 hours per scanner type
CBCT Integration (for Surgical Guides)
- ☐ Configure DICOM export from CBCT software
- ☐ Set up secure file transfer to Matisse AI (SFTP or direct integration)
- ☐ Map DICOM study to patient record in PMS
- 🔵 ☐ Verify Matisse AI can ingest DICOM and generate planning views
- ⚠️ ☐ Test surgical guide design workflow end-to-end
Estimated Time: 3–4 hours (requires clinical validation)
Test Environment Setup
Centralized Test Environment (Recommended for DSO)
🟣 ☐ Decision: Use shared test environment vs. per-location test instances
- Recommendation: Shared test environment for integration testing; brief per-location testing for local validation only
☐ Request test environment provisioning from Matisse AI 🔵 ☐ Matisse AI provisions sandbox with sample data ☐ Configure test environment with representative configuration ☐ Grant access to central IT, regional IT leads, and champion group ☐ Document test scenarios and expected outcomes
Validation Checklist
☐ File upload: STL files process correctly ☐ Auto-orientation: Algorithm produces expected results ☐ Support generation: Supports appropriate for case type ☐ Nesting: Multi-part jobs nest efficiently ☐ Print job submission: Jobs queue to correct printer ☐ Status tracking: Job status updates reflect accurately ☐ PMS sync: Case updates flow to PMS ☐ Reporting: Analytics dashboards populate ☐ User permissions: RBAC enforced correctly ☐ SSO: Login via identity provider works
Data Migration
Historical Data Ingestion (Optional but Recommended)
- ☐ Export historical print job data from existing systems (past 12 months)
- ☐ Format data per Matisse AI import template (CSV)
- 🔵 ☐ Submit to Matisse AI for bulk import
- ☐ Verify imported data in analytics dashboards
- ☐ Note: Historical data enables better optimization immediately
Decision Point: 🟣 ☐ Determine if historical data import is worth effort vs. learning from fresh data
- Import recommended if you have digital records of > 500 print jobs
Security and HIPAA Compliance
Enterprise-Level HIPAA Checklist
Business Associate Agreement: 🟣 ☐ Execute BAA with Matisse AI (required before any PHI transfer) ☐ Verify BAA covers all data types being transferred ☐ Confirm BAA chain includes any Matisse AI subprocessors ☐ File BAA with compliance/legal team
Data Governance: ☐ Document what PHI is stored in Matisse AI:
- Patient names (if synced from PMS)
- Patient identifiers
- Case images/files
- Provider information ☐ Confirm data residency requirements (US-based servers for US practices) ☐ Verify encryption standards:
- At rest: AES-256 or equivalent
- In transit: TLS 1.2+ ☐ Document data retention policy:
- How long does Matisse AI retain case data?
- What is the deletion process upon request?
Access Controls: ☐ Implement role-based access per RBAC matrix (Section 2) ☐ Configure automatic session timeout (recommended: 15 minutes) ☐ Enable MFA for all admin accounts ☐ Document user provisioning/deprovisioning process ☐ Verify audit logging captures access events
Technical Safeguards: ☐ Confirm Matisse AI SOC 2 Type II certification ☐ Request most recent penetration test summary ☐ Verify backup and disaster recovery capabilities ☐ Confirm incident response process and notification timelines
Compliance Documentation: ☐ Add Matisse AI to vendor inventory ☐ Complete risk assessment questionnaire ☐ Document Matisse AI in system architecture diagrams ☐ Update
AI-generated implementation guide based on public vendor information. Verify specifics directly with Matisse AI.