Neocis Yomi
Step-by-step implementation guide — pre-implementation checklist, onboarding, staff training, go-live runbook, and ROI tracking.
Neocis Yomi — Implementation Playbook (DSO)
Neocis Yomi Implementation Playbook
Robotic-Assisted Dental Implant Surgery Platform
A Strategic Deployment Guide for Dental Support Organizations
1. Executive Summary
What Neocis Yomi Does
Neocis Yomi is an FDA-cleared robotic-assisted surgical platform that provides real-time, haptic-guided navigation for dental implant placement. The system integrates preoperative CBCT imaging with intraoperative physical guidance, allowing surgeons to execute digitally planned implant trajectories with sub-millimeter precision while maintaining full manual control throughout the procedure.
Why DSOs Benefit from Robotic Surgical AI
Scale Advantages:
- Standardized surgical outcomes across providers of varying experience levels—a first-year implantologist can achieve placement precision comparable to a 20-year veteran
- Centralized case planning enables specialist oversight of surgical plans across all locations without physical presence
- Reduced referral leakage by enabling GPs with implant training to confidently place complex cases in-house
- Premium service differentiation creates marketing advantage across your entire footprint simultaneously
Operational Precision:
- Predictable procedure times reduce chair time variability that disrupts scheduling
- Lower complication rates decrease costly rework, patient complaints, and malpractice exposure
- Data aggregation across locations enables identification of best practices and outlier performance
Financial Impact:
- Average 15-25% increase in implant case acceptance when patients see robotic-guided precision
- Reduction in costly complications (nerve damage, sinus perforation) that average $15,000-$50,000 per incident
- Potential to bring 20-40% of referred implant cases in-house at full margin
Expected Timeline: Decision to Full Deployment
| Phase | Timeline | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Implementation | Weeks 1-2 | Vendor contracting, technical assessment, baseline metrics |
| Wave 1 Pilot | Weeks 3-10 | 2-3 locations, intensive monitoring |
| Wave 2 Expansion | Weeks 11-20 | 5-8 additional locations |
| Wave 3 Full Deployment | Weeks 21-32 | Remaining locations |
| Optimization | Weeks 33-40 | Performance refinement, full ROI assessment |
Total timeline for 25-location DSO: 8-10 months Total timeline for 50-location DSO: 12-14 months
2. Pre-Implementation Checklist (Weeks 1-2)
Technical Requirements
Hardware Requirements Per Location
☐ Yomi Robotic System Unit — Floor-mounted robotic arm with surgical handpiece interface
- Dimensions: Approximately 24" x 24" footprint, 60" height
- Weight: ~200 lbs (requires structural floor assessment for older buildings)
- Power: Dedicated 120V/20A circuit within 6 feet of planned installation
☐ Workstation Computer — Vendor-provided or spec-compliant
- Minimum: Intel i7, 32GB RAM, NVIDIA RTX graphics card
- Display: Dual 27" 4K monitors recommended
☐ CBCT Compatibility Verification 🔵
- Supported systems: Carestream, Planmeca, Sirona, i-CAT, Vatech
- Required: DICOM export capability
- ⚠️ Common failure point: Older CBCT units may require firmware updates
☐ Network Infrastructure
- Minimum 100 Mbps upload/download per location
- Dedicated VLAN for surgical equipment recommended
- Static IP assignment capability
☐ Physical Space Assessment
- Operatory minimum: 12' x 12' recommended
- Clear ceiling height: 9' minimum
- Proximity to CBCT: Same floor preferred for workflow efficiency
Software Requirements
☐ Yomi Planning Software — Cloud-based with local processing ☐ Compatible imaging viewer for CBCT import ☐ Practice Management System integration module (see Section 5)
Enterprise-Level Requirements (DSO-Specific)
☐ Network Standards Across Locations 🟣
- Decision required: Standardized network architecture vs. location-specific accommodations
- Recommendation: Mandate minimum network specifications but allow implementation flexibility
- VPN requirements for centralized case planning access
☐ Centralized vs. Location-Level Hosting
- Yomi utilizes hybrid architecture: local processing with cloud backup
- Centralized dashboard requires cloud access from all locations
- SSO integration available via SAML 2.0
☐ Single Sign-On (SSO) Configuration 🔵
- Supported providers: Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace
- Timeline: 2-3 weeks for enterprise SSO setup
- Requires coordination with your IT security team
☐ Centralized Credentialing
- Provider certification tracking at enterprise level
- Role-based access control configuration
- Audit log access for compliance team
Vendor Onboarding Steps 🔵
| Step | Owner | Timeline | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Master Service Agreement | Legal/Procurement | Days 1-5 | Signed MSA covering all planned locations |
| Assign Enterprise Account Manager | Neocis | Day 3 | Named contact for DSO-level coordination |
| Complete Site Survey Questionnaire | Operations | Days 3-7 | Per-location technical assessment |
| Schedule Physical Site Surveys | Neocis + Local OMs | Days 7-14 | Wave 1 locations surveyed |
| Finalize Implementation Timeline | Joint | Day 14 | Approved rollout schedule |
Key Vendor Contacts to Establish
☐ Enterprise Account Manager — Strategic relationship, contract matters ☐ Implementation Project Manager — Day-to-day rollout coordination ☐ Clinical Applications Specialist — Provider training and certification ☐ Technical Support Escalation Contact — After-hours emergency support ☐ Customer Success Manager — Post-implementation optimization
Data/Access Prerequisites
☐ CBCT Archive Access
- Identify current storage location (local server, cloud, vendor-hosted)
- Obtain admin credentials for export configuration
- Test DICOM export functionality at each Wave 1 location
☐ Practice Management System Admin Access
- Dentrix Enterprise: Enterprise Administrator credentials
- Eaglesoft: Server admin access
- Open Dental: Database admin credentials
☐ Network Credentials
- Firewall rule modification access
- Static IP assignment capability
- VPN configuration access (if applicable)
☐ Imaging System Admin Access
- CBCT software admin credentials
- Protocol creation permissions
- Export settings modification rights
Internal Stakeholder Alignment
Stakeholder Alignment Map
| Stakeholder | Role in Implementation | Communication Cadence | Key Concerns to Address |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board/Investors 🟣 | Approve capital expenditure, monitor ROI | Monthly summary | Capital allocation, competitive advantage, risk mitigation |
| CEO 🟣 | Executive sponsor, remove blockers | Bi-weekly briefing | Strategic alignment, timeline, resource allocation |
| CDO/Chief Dental Officer 🟣 | Clinical validation, provider buy-in | Weekly working session | Clinical efficacy, training adequacy, patient safety |
| VP of Operations | Day-to-day implementation leadership | Daily during rollout | Timeline adherence, operational disruption, staff adoption |
| CFO | Budget oversight, ROI tracking | Bi-weekly metrics | Cost tracking, financial projections, vendor payments |
| VP of IT | Technical infrastructure, security | Weekly technical sync | Integration complexity, security compliance, support burden |
| Regional Managers | Cascade communication, local problem-solving | Weekly calls per region | Location-specific challenges, staff concerns |
| Office Managers | Local logistics, staff coordination | Daily during location go-live | Schedule disruption, staff training time, patient communication |
| Implant Providers | Clinical adoption, procedure execution | Training + ongoing | Learning curve, workflow change, certification requirements |
Approval Gates 🟣
| Decision | Approver | Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Final vendor selection and contract terms | CEO + CFO | Week 1 |
| Capital budget allocation | Board/CFO | Week 1 |
| Wave 1 location selection | VP Ops + CDO | Week 2 |
| Standardized protocols vs. local flexibility | CDO | Week 2 |
| Go-live authorization per wave | VP Ops | Per wave |
Baseline Metrics Capture
⚠️ Critical: Capture These Metrics BEFORE Implementation
Standardized baseline measurement across all locations enables cross-location comparison and accurate ROI calculation.
Surgical Outcome Metrics (Per Location, Per Provider) ☐ Total implant cases per month (12-month lookback) ☐ Implant survival rate at 1 year ☐ Complication rate (nerve injury, sinus perforation, implant failure) ☐ Average procedure time per implant ☐ Revision/rework rate
Financial Metrics (Per Location) ☐ Average implant case revenue ☐ Average implant case margin ☐ Referral-out rate for implant cases ☐ Case acceptance rate for implant treatment plans ☐ Marketing cost per acquired implant patient
Operational Metrics (Per Location) ☐ Chair time utilization for implant operatories ☐ Scheduling efficiency (actual vs. scheduled procedure time) ☐ Staff overtime related to implant procedures
Patient Experience Metrics ☐ Net Promoter Score (if tracked) ☐ Implant-specific satisfaction scores (if available) ☐ Post-operative complaint rate
Standardization Protocol for Baseline Capture
- Create centralized data collection template — Excel or integrated into existing BI tools
- Assign data collection owner per location — typically Office Manager
- Set 2-week deadline for historical data submission
- Central validation — VP Ops team reviews for completeness and accuracy
- Establish baseline report — locked snapshot before any implementation begins
3. Location Readiness Assessment
Scoring Framework
Rate each factor 1-5 using the criteria below. Calculate composite score for rollout prioritization.
Factor 1: IT Infrastructure Maturity (Weight: 25%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Fiber internet (500+ Mbps), hardware <2 years old, current PMS version, dedicated IT support |
| 4 | 200+ Mbps internet, hardware <3 years old, PMS within one version of current |
| 3 | 100+ Mbps internet, hardware <5 years old, supported PMS version |
| 2 | 50-100 Mbps internet, aging hardware, PMS requiring updates |
| 1 | <50 Mbps internet, outdated hardware, legacy PMS version |
Factor 2: Staff Tenure and Adaptability (Weight: 20%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | <15% annual turnover, history of successful tech adoption, staff training completion >95% |
| 4 | 15-25% turnover, positive but limited tech adoption history |
| 3 | 25-35% turnover, mixed tech adoption results |
| 2 | 35-50% turnover, resistance to recent technology changes |
| 1 | >50% turnover, failed recent technology implementations |
Factor 3: Patient Volume and Case Mix (Weight: 20%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | 20+ implant cases/month, diverse case complexity, capacity for growth |
| 4 | 15-20 implant cases/month, moderate complexity mix |
| 3 | 10-15 implant cases/month, straightforward case mix |
| 2 | 5-10 implant cases/month, limited complexity |
| 1 | <5 implant cases/month, limited implant program |
Factor 4: Existing Tech Stack Compatibility (Weight: 20%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Enterprise PMS, Yomi-certified CBCT, existing digital workflow, API-ready |
| 4 | Supported PMS, compatible CBCT, partial digital workflow |
| 3 | Supported PMS, CBCT requires minor updates, traditional workflow |
| 2 | Supported PMS but outdated version, CBCT compatibility uncertain |
| 1 | Unsupported PMS, incompatible CBCT, requires significant upgrades |
Factor 5: Local Champion Availability (Weight: 15%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Enthusiastic implant provider + tech-savvy OM, both committed to champion role |
| 4 | Enthusiastic provider OR strong OM champion |
| 3 | Willing provider, neutral office manager |
| 2 | Skeptical provider, limited local leadership interest |
| 1 | Provider resistance, no viable champion candidate |
Composite Score Calculation
Composite Score = (IT × 0.25) + (Staff × 0.20) + (Volume × 0.20) + (Tech × 0.20) + (Champion × 0.15)
Score Interpretation
| Composite Score | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| 4.0 - 5.0 | Wave 1 Pilot Candidate |
| 3.0 - 3.9 | Wave 2 Expansion |
| 2.0 - 2.9 | Wave 3 - Requires pre-work |
| <2.0 | Defer - Address readiness gaps first |
Sample Location Assessment Matrix
| Location | IT (25%) | Staff (20%) | Volume (20%) | Tech (20%) | Champion (15%) | Composite | Wave |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metro North | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4.60 | 1 |
| Suburban East | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | 1 |
| Downtown Core | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4.30 | 1 |
| West Valley | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3.35 | 2 |
| South County | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3.20 | 2 |
| Rural North | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.55 | 3 |
4. Rollout Strategy
Recommended Wave Structure
Wave 1: Pilot Phase (2-3 Locations)
Timeline: Weeks 3-10 (8 weeks)
Selection Criteria for Wave 1:
- Composite readiness score ≥4.0
- Geographic diversity (if applicable) to test regional support logistics
- Representative of your broader portfolio (at least one high-volume, one moderate-volume)
- ⚠️ Avoid selecting ONLY your highest-performing locations—success there doesn't validate scalability
- Strong local champion committed to detailed feedback documentation
Wave 1 Detailed Timeline:
| Week | Activity |
|---|---|
| 3 | Equipment delivery and installation at Location 1 |
| 4 | Equipment installation at Locations 2-3, staff training begins |
| 5 | Provider certification training (2-day intensive) 🔵 |
| 6 | Supervised cases begin (Neocis clinical specialist on-site) 🔵 |
| 7-8 | Independent operation with remote support |
| 9 | Mid-wave assessment and learning capture |
| 10 | Wave 1 completion, go/no-go decision for Wave 2 🟣 |
Wave 2: Expansion Phase (5-8 Locations)
Timeline: Weeks 11-20 (10 weeks)
Selection Criteria for Wave 2:
- Composite readiness score 3.0-3.9
- Include at least 2 locations per region for regional support efficiency
- Prioritize locations where Wave 1 champions can provide peer mentorship
Wave 2 Detailed Timeline:
| Week | Activity |
|---|---|
| 11-12 | Equipment delivery and installation (staggered, 2-3 per week) |
| 13-14 | Staff training (leveraging train-the-trainer model from Wave 1) |
| 15 | Provider certification (group sessions if geographically feasible) 🔵 |
| 16-17 | Supervised cases (reduced vendor support, peer mentorship added) |
| 18-19 | Independent operation |
| 20 | Wave 2 completion, go/no-go decision for Wave 3 🟣 |
Wave 3: Full Deployment (Remaining Locations)
Timeline: Weeks 21-32 (12 weeks)
Considerations for Wave 3:
- Include locations requiring pre-work (infrastructure upgrades completed during Waves 1-2)
- Scale training through regional hub model
- Reduce vendor on-site support, leverage internal expertise
Go/No-Go Criteria 🟣
Advancement to Next Wave Requires:
Clinical Criteria: ☐ Zero serious adverse events attributed to system ☐ Provider certification completion rate ≥90% ☐ Case completion rate ≥95% (cases not aborted due to system issues)
Operational Criteria: ☐ Average procedure time within 20% of baseline (accounting for learning curve) ☐ No critical unresolved technical issues ☐ Staff satisfaction score ≥3.5/5.0
Financial Criteria: ☐ Actual costs within 15% of budget ☐ No scope creep requiring additional capital beyond approved amount
Learning Capture: ☐ Documented lessons learned from current wave ☐ Updated training materials incorporating feedback ☐ Process improvements identified and approved for next wave
Rollback Plan
⚠️ Wave Pause Triggers
Pause current wave and halt future wave starts if:
- Serious adverse event potentially related to system
25% of cases requiring vendor emergency support
- Provider refusal rate >30%
- Critical security or compliance issue identified
Pause Protocol
Immediate (Within 4 hours):
- Halt new case scheduling at affected location(s)
- Notify VP Ops, CDO, and CEO
- Engage vendor technical escalation
Within 24 hours:
- Complete root cause assessment
- Document scope of issue (isolated vs. systemic)
- Determine if cases in progress can safely continue
Within 72 hours:
- Executive decision: resume, continue pause, or rollback 🟣
- If rollback: revert to previous surgical workflow
- Communicate to all stakeholders
Rollback Execution (If Required)
☐ Retain all equipment in place (avoid reinstallation costs) ☐ Document all identified issues for vendor resolution ☐ Resume traditional implant workflow ☐ Maintain provider certifications for future restart ☐ Negotiate contract terms for pause period with vendor 🔵
5. Configuration & Integration (Weeks 2-3)
Practice Management System Integration
Dentrix Enterprise Integration
Timeline: 3-5 days per location cluster
| Step | Owner | Duration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Verify Dentrix Enterprise version compatibility 🔵 | IT + Neocis | 2 hours | Minimum version 17.0 required |
| 2. Install Yomi Bridge Module | IT | 1 hour | Provided by Neocis |
| 3. Configure API connection | IT + Neocis | 2 hours | Requires Enterprise admin credentials |
| 4. Map procedure codes | Revenue Cycle | 2 hours | D6010 series + custom codes |
| 5. Test patient data pull | IT | 1 hour | Verify demographics, scheduling sync |
| 6. Configure automatic case documentation | Clinical Ops | 2 hours | Surgical notes, planning records |
| 7. Validate billing integration | Revenue Cycle | 2 hours | Test claim generation |
⚠️ Common failure point: Dentrix Enterprise firewall settings blocking API calls—work with Henry Schein support if issues persist.
Eaglesoft Integration
Timeline: 3-5 days per location cluster
| Step | Owner | Duration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Verify Eaglesoft version compatibility 🔵 | IT + Neocis | 2 hours | Version 21.0+ recommended |
| 2. Enable HL7 interface | IT | 1 hour | May require Patterson support |
| 3. Install integration middleware | IT + Neocis | 2 hours | Vendor-provided |
| 4. Configure patient matching rules | IT | 1 hour | DOB + Last Name + First 3 of First Name |
| 5. Test bidirectional data flow | IT | 2 hours | Scheduling, clinical notes |
| 6. Configure image linking | Clinical Ops | 2 hours | CBCT studies visible in patient record |
| 7. Validate documentation workflow | Providers | 2 hours | Surgical notes auto-populate |
Open Dental Integration
Timeline: 2-4 days per location cluster
| Step | Owner | Duration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Verify Open Dental version and API key availability | IT | 1 hour | API access requires Open Dental premium |
| 2. Generate API credentials | IT | 30 mins | API key from Open Dental web portal |
| 3. Configure Yomi API connection 🔵 | IT + Neocis | 2 hours | REST API integration |
| 4. Test patient search and retrieval | IT | 1 hour | Verify all fields sync |
| 5. Configure procedure auto-posting | Revenue Cycle | 2 hours | Direct posting to ledger |
| 6. Set up image management linking | Clinical Ops | 1 hour | Integration with imaging mount |
| 7. Validate end-to-end workflow | Full team | 2 hours | Complete test case |
Imaging System Integration
CBCT System Configuration 🔵
| CBCT System | Integration Method | Key Steps | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carestream | Direct DICOM push | Enable DICOM node, configure AE title, test transfer | 2 hours |
| Planmeca Romexis | DICOM export + import | Configure export template, set up watched folder | 3 hours |
| Sirona Galileos | SIDEXIS integration | Enable DICOM export, configure destination | 2 hours |
| i-CAT | Direct DICOM connectivity | Configure network path, test volume transfer | 2 hours |
| Vatech | DICOM export | Manual or automated export workflow | 3 hours |
Integration Validation Checklist
☐ Image quality verification — Minimum 0.2mm voxel size for planning ☐ Patient ID matching — CBCT patient ID matches PMS patient record ☐ Volume completeness — Full arch capture included ☐ Metadata accuracy — Correct patient name, DOB, scan date ☐ Transfer reliability — Test 10 consecutive transfers without failure
Test Environment Setup
Standardized Test Protocol (Per Location)
☐ Test Case 1: New Patient Workflow
- Create test patient in PMS
- Acquire or import sample CBCT
- Complete full surgical plan
- Execute simulated procedure on phantom jaw
- Verify documentation posts to PMS
☐ Test Case 2: Existing Patient Workflow
- Pull existing patient from PMS
- Import existing CBCT
- Complete planning
- Verify historical data accessible
☐ Test Case 3: Network Disruption
- Simulate network outage during planning
- Verify local cache enables continuation
- Confirm automatic sync on reconnection
☐ Test Case 4: Multi-Provider Workflow
- Case planned by Provider A
- Executed by Provider B
- Verify access controls and handoff documentation
Enterprise-Level Configuration
Standardized Configuration Template
Settings to Standardize Across All Locations:
| Setting | Standard Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Safety margin defaults | 2mm from vital structures | CDO-approved clinical standard |
| Drill sequence protocols | Per implant system catalog | Consistency across providers |
| Documentation templates | Enterprise template set | Compliance uniformity |
| Access control roles | 4 roles: Admin, Provider, Planner, Viewer | Security standardization |
| Backup frequency | Continuous + daily archive | Data protection compliance |
| Session timeout | 15 minutes | HIPAA compliance |
Location-Specific Configuration (Local Discretion Allowed)
| Setting | Local Discretion | Governance |
|---|---|---|
| Provider personal preferences | Handpiece orientation, display layout | Provider-level |
| Implant system catalogs | Based on location's vendor relationships | Office Manager |
| Scheduling block durations | Based on provider speed | Office Manager + Provider |
| Secondary approver settings | Based on staffing | Office Manager |
Security and HIPAA Compliance
Enterprise-Level HIPAA Checklist 🟣
☐ Business Associate Agreement (BAA)
- Signed enterprise BAA covering all locations 🔵
- Scope includes all data handling by Neocis
- Subcontractor flow-down provisions confirmed
☐ Data Governance
- Data residency confirmed (US-based servers)
- Encryption at rest (AES-256 minimum)
- Encryption in transit (TLS 1.2+)
- Data retention policy documented
☐ Access Controls
- Role-based access implemented
- Unique user credentials (no shared logins)
- Access logging enabled
- Quarterly access review process established
☐ Audit and Monitoring
- Audit logs retained minimum 6 years
- Central security team access to enterprise audit dashboard
- Automated alerting for anomalous access patterns
☐ Incident Response
- Vendor incident notification procedures documented
- Integration with your incident response plan
- Contact escalation for security events
☐ Training
- Staff HIPAA training updated to include Yomi system
- Annual recertification requirement added
6. Team Training Plan
Train-the-Trainer Model
Champion Selection Criteria
Each location requires one certified Yomi Champion who will:
- Complete advanced certification beyond standard user training
- Deliver role-specific training to local team members
- Serve as first-line support for questions and troubleshooting
- Provide feedback to central team on local implementation
Ideal Champion Profile:
- Provider performing implants OR experienced surgical assistant
- Tenure ≥2 years at location
- History of positive technology adoption
- Strong communication skills
- Willing to commit 8 hours to advanced training
- Available for monthly champion network calls
Champion Certification Path:
| Stage | Content | Duration | Delivered By |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | Standard provider training | 8 hours | Neocis 🔵 |
| Stage 2 | Advanced troubleshooting | 4 hours | Neocis 🔵 |
| Stage 3 | Train-the-trainer methodology | 2 hours | Learning & Development |
| Stage 4 | Certification assessment | 1 hour | Neocis + L&D |
Standardized Training Materials (Created Centrally)
☐ Provider Training Deck — 45 slides, 2-hour delivery ☐ Surgical Assistant Quick Guide — 8 pages, laminated ☐ Front Desk Scripts — Patient communication talking points ☐ Day 1 Cheat Sheets — Role-specific single-page references ☐ Video Library — 12 procedure videos, accessible via QR codes ☐ Troubleshooting Decision Tree — Flowchart for common issues
Local Customization (Champion Responsibility)
☐ Adapt examples to local patient population ☐ Add location-specific emergency contacts ☐ Incorporate local provider preferences where permitted ☐ Schedule training around local operational constraints
Role-Specific Training Outlines
Providers (Surgeons/Implantologists)
Training Time: 8 hours (split across 2 days recommended)
Format: Day 1: Vendor-led didactic + simulation | Day 2: Live supervised cases 🔵
Content:
| Module | Duration | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| System Overview | 30 mins | Architecture, capabilities, limitations |
| Preoperative Planning | 2 hours | Case planning software, anatomy identification, implant positioning |
| Intraoperative Workflow | 2 hours | Registration, navigation, haptic guidance interpretation |
| Hands-On Simulation | 2 hours | Phantom jaw exercises, calibration practice |
| Live Supervised Case | 1.5 hours | First patient case with Neocis specialist present 🔵 |
Common Resistance Points & Responses:
| Resistance | Response |
|---|---|
| "This will slow me down" | Learning curve is 5-8 cases; procedure time typically equals baseline by case 10 |
| "I don't need a robot to place implants" | System provides guardrails, not replacement—you maintain full control and can override |
| "What if it fails mid-procedure?" | Fallback protocol enables immediate conversion to freehand; no patient safety risk |
| "This is just a marketing gimmick" | Clinical data shows 0.5mm improvement in accuracy; relevant for complex cases near vital structures |
Provider Day 1 Cheat Sheet:
+------------------------------------------+
| YOMI QUICK REFERENCE |
+------------------------------------------+
| PRE-OP CHECKLIST |
| ☐ Case plan reviewed and approved |
| ☐ System startup complete (green light) |
| ☐ Patient registration confirmed |
| ☐ Handpiece calibration verified |
+------------------------------------------+
| DURING PROCEDURE |
| • Green zone: Optimal trajectory |
| • Yellow zone: Approaching limit |
| • Red zone + haptic: STOP |
| • Override: Press and hold blue button |
+------------------------------------------+
| EMERGENCY PROCEDURES |
| • System freeze: Press red STOP |
| • Continue freehand: Disengage handpiece |
| • Support: [Local champion phone] |
| • Vendor: 1-800-XXX-XXXX, Option 3 |
+------------------------------------------+
Surgical Assistants/Hygienists
Training Time: 3 hours
Format: Champion-led session with hands-on equipment familiarization
Content:
| Module | Duration | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| System Components | 30 mins | Hardware identification, basic function |
| Setup and Calibration | 45 mins | Pre-procedure checklist, sterile draping |
| Intraoperative Role | 45 mins | Monitoring displays, instrument passing, documentation |
| Troubleshooting Basics | 30 mins | Common issues, when to escalate |
| Hands-On Practice | 30 mins | Equipment manipulation, setup walkthrough |
Common Resistance Points & Responses:
| Resistance | Response |
|---|---|
| "This is one more thing to maintain" | Setup adds only 5-7 minutes; reduces procedure time overall |
| "What if I break something?" | Equipment is robust; focus on sterile handling, not technical expertise |
Surgical Assistant Day 1 Cheat Sheet:
+------------------------------------------+
| SURGICAL ASSISTANT QUICK REFERENCE |
+------------------------------------------+
| PRE-PROCEDURE (15 mins before) |
| ☐ Power on system (green button) |
| ☐ Attach sterile drape per protocol |
| ☐ Verify handpiece connection |
| ☐ Confirm provider's case plan loaded |
+--
AI-generated implementation guide based on public vendor information. Verify specifics directly with Neocis Yomi.