NoteSwift
Step-by-step implementation guide β pre-implementation checklist, onboarding, staff training, go-live runbook, and ROI tracking.
NoteSwift β Implementation Playbook (DSO)
NoteSwift Implementation Playbook
AI Scribe Deployment Guide for Dental Support Organizations
1. Executive Summary
What NoteSwift Does
NoteSwift is an AI-powered clinical documentation scribe that listens to provider-patient conversations in real-time, automatically generating structured clinical notes, treatment documentation, and procedure narratives directly into your practice management system. The tool eliminates manual charting, reduces after-hours documentation burden, and standardizes clinical language across your organization.
Why DSOs Specifically Benefit from AI Scribes
| Scale Advantage | DSO Impact |
|---|---|
| Standardization | Uniform clinical documentation language, terminology, and formatting across 15β50+ locations creates consistency for audits, compliance reviews, and quality assurance |
| Data Aggregation | Centralized documentation patterns enable enterprise-wide clinical analyticsβidentify procedure trends, treatment planning variations, and documentation quality gaps across regions |
| Provider Retention | Reducing documentation burden by 60β90 minutes daily directly impacts provider satisfaction and reduces turnover at scale |
| Compliance at Scale | Consistent, AI-verified documentation reduces audit risk and supports defensible records across your entire portfolio |
| Training Efficiency | New providers onboard faster with AI-assisted documentation, reducing ramp time across high-turnover locations |
Expected Timeline: Decision to Full Deployment
| Phase | Duration | Milestone |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Implementation | Weeks 1β2 | Vendor contract, technical assessment, baseline metrics |
| Pilot Wave (2β3 locations) | Weeks 3β6 | Go-live, stabilization, success criteria validation |
| Wave 2 (5β8 locations) | Weeks 7β10 | Expanded rollout with refined playbook |
| Wave 3+ (Remaining locations) | Weeks 11β16 | Full deployment |
| Optimization | Weeks 17β20 | Performance tuning, ROI validation |
Total timeline for 30-location DSO: 16β20 weeks from signed contract to full deployment
2. Pre-Implementation Checklist (Weeks 1β2)
Technical Requirements
Hardware (Per Operatory)
β Dedicated microphone system OR tablet/mobile device with microphone capability β Verify minimum device specs: iOS 14+ / Android 11+ / Windows 10+ with 8GB RAM β Operatory workstation with stable internet connection (minimum 10 Mbps up/down) β Secondary display recommended for note review (not required)
Software
β Practice Management System compatibility verified (Dentrix G7+, Eaglesoft 21+, Open Dental 22.1+) β Browser requirements: Chrome 90+ or Edge 90+ for web dashboard β Mobile app downloaded and license activated per provider
Network
β HIPAA-compliant network configuration with encryption in transit β Firewall exceptions documented for NoteSwift endpoints (vendor provides list) β Guest/patient WiFi segregated from clinical network β β οΈ Minimum latency requirements: <100ms to NoteSwift servers for real-time transcription
Vendor Onboarding Steps
| Week | Action | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1, Day 1 | π΅ Kick-off call with NoteSwift implementation manager | VP Ops + Vendor |
| Week 1, Day 2 | π΅ Receive enterprise license keys and admin credentials | Vendor |
| Week 1, Day 3 | Designate internal project lead and technical point of contact | VP Ops |
| Week 1, Day 4 | π΅ Schedule integration planning session | IT + Vendor |
| Week 1, Day 5 | π΅ Execute Business Associate Agreement (BAA) | Legal + Vendor |
Key Vendor Contacts to Establish
β Implementation Manager (primary contact during rollout) β Technical Integration Specialist β Enterprise Support Line (dedicated for DSO accounts) β Customer Success Manager (post-implementation) β Executive Sponsor at NoteSwift (for escalations)
Data/Access Prerequisites
β PMS admin credentials for integration setup β π΅ API keys from NoteSwift (vendor provides) β Provider NPI numbers for all locations β Active directory or identity provider access for SSO configuration β β οΈ Historical patient data NOT requiredβNoteSwift operates on forward-looking documentation only β Test patient records created in sandbox environment
Internal Stakeholder Alignment
π£ Approval Required From:
β CEO/COO β Enterprise software commitment, budget allocation β Chief Dental Officer β Clinical workflow changes, documentation standards β CFO β ROI expectations, contract terms β General Counsel β BAA review, data governance β VP of IT β Technical architecture, security review
Informed (No Approval Needed):
β Regional Managers β Rollout timeline, location impact β Office Managers β Training requirements, workflow changes β Revenue Cycle/Billing Lead β Documentation impact on coding
Baseline Metrics to Capture BEFORE Go-Live
β οΈ Critical: Capture these metrics 30 days before go-live to enable accurate ROI measurement
| Metric | Definition | Collection Method | Target Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation Time per Patient | Minutes spent charting per patient encounter | Provider self-report survey (7-day sample) | Providers |
| After-Hours Documentation | Hours spent on notes outside clinical hours weekly | Provider self-report | Providers |
| Chart Completion Rate | % of charts completed same-day | PMS report | IT/Ops |
| Documentation Error Rate | % of charts requiring correction/amendment | Random audit of 50 charts/location | CDO Office |
| Provider Satisfaction Score | Documentation burden rating 1-10 | Anonymous survey | HR/Ops |
| Patient Throughput | Patients seen per provider per day | PMS report | IT |
| Coding Accuracy Rate | % of procedure codes matching documentation | Billing audit | Revenue Cycle |
DSO-Specific: Standardize Baseline Measurement
π£ Executive Decision Required: Approve standardized baseline protocol
β Create uniform survey instrument for all locations β Establish 30-day data collection window (same dates across all locations) β Designate regional managers as accountable for baseline data collection β Central analytics team aggregates and validates data quality β β οΈ Do NOT proceed to Wave 1 without validated baseline data from pilot locations
Enterprise-Level Requirements
Network Standards Across Locations
β Audit network capabilities at all locations (use vendor-provided network test tool) β π΅ Document minimum bandwidth requirements (10 Mbps sustained per concurrent user) β Identify locations requiring network upgradesβflag for pre-Wave remediation β Confirm VPN/SD-WAN compatibility with NoteSwift traffic
Hosting Architecture Decision
π£ Executive Decision Required: Centralized vs. Location-Level Configuration
| Option | Pros | Cons | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralized Hosting | Single admin console, uniform policies, easier audit | Single point of failure, requires robust connectivity | β Recommended for DSOs |
| Location-Level | Local resilience, autonomy | Configuration drift, harder to manage | Not recommended |
Single Sign-On (SSO) Configuration
β π΅ NoteSwift supports SAML 2.0 and OAuth 2.0βconfirm with vendor β Integrate with existing identity provider (Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace) β Map user roles: Provider, Hygienist, Admin, Billing, Read-Only β Test SSO in sandbox before production
Centralized Credentialing
β Provider roster uploaded to NoteSwift with NPI, specialty, location assignments β Establish process for adding/removing providers as staffing changes β Designate credentialing admin (typically HR or Ops)
Stakeholder Alignment Map
| Stakeholder Level | Who | What They Need to Know | When | Communication Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board/Investors | Board members | ROI thesis, timeline, risk mitigation | Pre-contract, quarterly updates | CEO |
| C-Suite | CEO, COO, CDO, CFO | Strategic rationale, budget, clinical impact | Week 1 | VP Ops |
| Regional Managers | Regional Ops Directors | Location selection rationale, rollout timeline, their role | Week 1β2 | VP Ops |
| Office Managers | Practice Managers | Training requirements, workflow changes, go-live date | Week 2β3 | Regional Managers |
| Providers | Dentists, Hygienists | How it works, what changes, benefits | Week 3 (pre-training) | CDO + Office Managers |
| Support Staff | Front desk, billing | Limited impact awareness, escalation paths | Week 3 | Office Managers |
3. Location Readiness Assessment
Scoring Framework
Score each factor 1β5 per location. Composite score determines rollout wave assignment.
Factor 1: IT Infrastructure Maturity (Weight: 25%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Fiber internet, <50ms latency, hardware <2 years old, current PMS version |
| 4 | Cable internet, <75ms latency, hardware <3 years old, PMS version N-1 |
| 3 | DSL/cable, <100ms latency, hardware <4 years old, supported PMS version |
| 2 | Inconsistent connectivity, older hardware, PMS version requiring upgrade |
| 1 | Network issues, outdated hardware, unsupported PMS version |
Assessment Method: Run NoteSwift network diagnostic tool (provided by vendor), PMS version audit, hardware inventory
Factor 2: Staff Tenure and Adaptability (Weight: 20%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | <15% annual turnover, previous successful tech rollout, team >2 years tenure avg |
| 4 | 15β25% turnover, neutral tech adoption history, team 1β2 years tenure avg |
| 3 | 25β35% turnover, mixed tech adoption, some staff resistance history |
| 2 | 35β50% turnover, poor tech adoption history, significant resistance anticipated |
| 1 | >50% turnover, failed previous tech rollouts, active staff issues |
Assessment Method: HR turnover data, office manager interview, previous technology adoption survey
Factor 3: Patient Volume (Weight: 20%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | 40β60 patients/day (high impact, manageable complexity) |
| 4 | 60β80 patients/day (high impact, moderate complexity) |
| 3 | 25β40 patients/day (moderate impact, low risk) |
| 2 | >80 patients/day (high risk due to volume) |
| 1 | <25 patients/day (low impact, limited ROI) |
Assessment Method: PMS patient volume reports (trailing 90-day average)
Factor 4: Tech Stack Compatibility (Weight: 20%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Dentrix Enterprise or Open Dental, integrated imaging, cloud-enabled |
| 4 | Eaglesoft current version, standard integrations, minimal customization |
| 3 | Supported PMS with some custom workflows requiring configuration |
| 2 | Older PMS version requiring upgrade, heavy customization |
| 1 | Unsupported PMS, siloed systems, no integration capability |
Assessment Method: PMS version audit, π΅ vendor compatibility check, integration inventory
Factor 5: Local Champion Availability (Weight: 15%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Tech-forward provider + engaged office manager, both willing to champion |
| 4 | Either provider or OM willing to champion, strong support from other |
| 3 | Office manager willing, providers neutral |
| 2 | No clear champion, but no active resistance |
| 1 | No champion available, or active resistance from leadership |
Assessment Method: Regional manager nomination, office manager interview, provider survey
Composite Score Calculation
| Factor | Weight | Location A Score | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
| IT Infrastructure | 25% | [1-5] | [Score Γ 0.25] |
| Staff Adaptability | 20% | [1-5] | [Score Γ 0.20] |
| Patient Volume | 20% | [1-5] | [Score Γ 0.20] |
| Tech Compatibility | 20% | [1-5] | [Score Γ 0.20] |
| Local Champion | 15% | [1-5] | [Score Γ 0.15] |
| Composite Score | 100% | β | [Total] |
Rollout Sequence Recommendation
| Composite Score | Wave Assignment | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0β5.0 | Wave 1 (Pilot) | High readiness, low risk, ideal for proving the model |
| 3.5β3.9 | Wave 2 | Strong readiness, deploy once playbook refined |
| 3.0β3.4 | Wave 3 | Moderate readiness, may need pre-work |
| 2.5β2.9 | Wave 4 | Requires remediation before deployment |
| <2.5 | Defer | Address infrastructure/staffing issues first |
Sample Rollout Sequence (30-Location DSO)
| Wave | Locations | Timing | Selection Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wave 1 | 3 locations | Weeks 3β6 | Highest composite scores (4.2+), geographic diversity, different PMS versions represented |
| Wave 2 | 7 locations | Weeks 7β10 | Scores 3.7β4.1, apply lessons from Wave 1 |
| Wave 3 | 10 locations | Weeks 11β14 | Scores 3.2β3.6, scaled deployment |
| Wave 4 | 10 locations | Weeks 15β18 | Remaining locations, remediation complete |
4. Rollout Strategy
Wave Structure for DSO Deployment
Recommended Approach: Controlled Wave Rollout
| Wave | Locations | Duration | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wave 1 (Pilot) | 2β3 locations | 4 weeks | Validate playbook, identify issues, build internal expertise |
| Wave 2 (Early Majority) | 5β8 locations | 3 weeks | Scale with refined process, train-the-trainer activation |
| Wave 3 (Majority) | 10β15 locations | 3 weeks | Parallel deployments, regional manager ownership |
| Wave 4 (Remainder) | Remaining locations | 2β3 weeks | Final locations, exception handling |
Wave 1 Pilot Location Selection Criteria
π£ Executive Decision Required: Final pilot location selection
Select 2β3 locations that meet ALL of the following:
β Composite readiness score β₯4.0 β Strong local champion (provider or OM) actively engaged β Manageable patient volume (40β60 patients/day ideal) β Geographic proximity to central support resources (if possible) β Represents your most common PMS (e.g., if 60% Dentrix, include β₯1 Dentrix location) β β οΈ NOT your highest-revenue location (avoid maximum financial risk) β β οΈ NOT a location with significant staff changes in next 90 days
Timeline Per Wave with Buffer
Week 1-2: Pre-Implementation (all locations)
Week 3: Wave 1 Go-Live
Week 4-5: Wave 1 Stabilization + Optimization
Week 6: Wave 1 Success Assessment + Wave 2 Prep
β Go/No-Go Decision Point
Week 7: Wave 2 Go-Live
Week 8-9: Wave 2 Stabilization
Week 10: Wave 2 Assessment + Wave 3 Prep
β Go/No-Go Decision Point
Week 11-13: Wave 3 Go-Live (parallel deployments)
Week 14: Wave 3 Stabilization
Week 15-17: Wave 4 Go-Live
Week 18-20: Full Deployment Optimization
Go/No-Go Criteria to Advance Between Waves
π£ Executive Decision Required: Wave advancement approval
Must achieve ALL of the following to proceed to next wave:
| Criterion | Threshold | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| System Uptime | β₯99% during business hours | NoteSwift dashboard |
| Provider Adoption | β₯80% of providers using for β₯80% of patients | Usage analytics |
| Documentation Completion | β₯90% same-day chart completion | PMS report |
| Training Completion | 100% of staff trained | LMS/sign-off sheets |
| Critical Issues | Zero unresolved P1 issues | Issue tracker |
| Provider Satisfaction | β₯7/10 average rating | Pulse survey |
Amber flags (proceed with caution):
- Provider adoption 70β79%
- 1β2 unresolved P2 issues
- Provider satisfaction 5β6/10
Red flags (do not proceed):
- Any unresolved P1 issues
- Provider adoption <70%
- Provider satisfaction <5/10
- β οΈ Any patient safety concerns
Rollback Plan
If a wave fails go/no-go criteria, execute the following:
Immediate Actions (Day 1 of Rollback): β Notify NoteSwift vendor support of rollback decision β Communicate to affected locations: "We're pausing to address [specific issues]" β Revert to manual documentation workflows β Do NOT disable NoteSwift accounts (maintain data access for troubleshooting)
Investigation Period (Days 2β7): β π΅ Joint root cause analysis with vendor β Document specific failure modes β Assess whether issues are location-specific or systemic β Determine remediation path and timeline
Recovery Options:
| Scenario | Response |
|---|---|
| Location-specific issue | Remediate that location, exclude from current wave, add to later wave |
| Systemic issue (vendor) | Pause all deployment, require vendor fix, revalidate in pilot |
| Training issue | Extend training, re-attempt in 2 weeks |
| Infrastructure issue | Remediate infrastructure, re-attempt when resolved |
π£ Executive Decision Required: Rollback decision and recovery path
5. Configuration & Integration (Weeks 2β3)
Practice Management System Integration
Dentrix Enterprise Integration
Estimated Time: 4β6 hours (with vendor support)
β π΅ Schedule integration call with NoteSwift technical team β Verify Dentrix Enterprise version (G7.2+ required) β Enable API access in Dentrix Enterprise Admin Console β Generate API credentials in Dentrix (Admin > Integrations > API Management) β π΅ Provide API credentials to NoteSwift during integration call β Configure user mapping (Dentrix User ID β NoteSwift Provider ID) β Set default clinical note template locations in Dentrix β β οΈ Test write-back functionality with test patient record BEFORE production β Validate procedure code mapping (ADA codes) β Configure auto-attachment of notes to treatment visits
Eaglesoft Integration
Estimated Time: 3β4 hours (with vendor support)
β π΅ Schedule integration call with NoteSwift technical team β Verify Eaglesoft version (21.20+ required) β Enable HL7/API bridge in Eaglesoft (Patterson support may be required) β β οΈ Note: Eaglesoft integration requires Patterson middleware licenseβconfirm active β π΅ Provide Eaglesoft server credentials to NoteSwift (view-only recommended) β Configure note destination (Clinical Notes module) β Test bidirectional data flow with test patient β Validate appointment sync accuracy
Open Dental Integration
Estimated Time: 2β3 hours (with vendor support)
β π΅ Schedule integration call with NoteSwift technical team β Verify Open Dental version (22.1+ required for full API support) β Enable API module in Open Dental (Setup > Miscellaneous > API) β Generate API key in Open Dental β π΅ Provide API key to NoteSwift β Configure user permissions for API access β Map procedure codes and note types β Test clinical note posting to Chart module β β οΈ If using Open Dental Cloud, verify firewall exceptions with Open Dental support
Integration with Imaging/Clinical Systems
If using integrated imaging (Dexis, Carestream, etc.):
β Assess whether NoteSwift needs to reference imaging data (typically noβscribe function only) β If imaging references needed in notes, configure image viewer shortcut integration β π΅ Verify with NoteSwift if your imaging system has available integration
If using separate clinical systems: β Document existing workflows for cross-referencing β Determine if NoteSwift notes will reference external system data β Configure copy/paste or manual reference workflow if integration not available
Test Environment Setup
Estimated Time: 2β3 hours per location
β Create sandbox/test environment in PMS (clone of production or dedicated test database) β Create 10 test patient records with realistic scenarios:
- New patient comprehensive exam
- Recall/hygiene visit
- Restorative procedure (crown, filling)
- Emergency visit
- Perio patient β π΅ Request NoteSwift sandbox tenant/credentials β Complete 5 end-to-end tests per scenario type β Validate notes appear correctly in PMS β Test note editing/amendment workflow β β οΈ Do NOT proceed to production without successful validation of ALL scenarios
Validation Checklist
| Test Case | Expected Result | Pass/Fail |
|---|---|---|
| New patient exam dictation | Full note appears in PMS within 60 seconds | β |
| Treatment codes mentioned | Codes suggested/auto-populated accurately | β |
| Provider identification | Correct provider attributed to note | β |
| Patient identification | Correct patient chart updated | β |
| Note editing | Edits save correctly to PMS | β |
| Multiple operatories | Concurrent sessions don't cross-contaminate | β |
| Network interruption | Graceful recovery, no data loss | β |
Data Migration/Historical Data
NoteSwift Note: AI scribes typically do NOT require historical data migrationβthey operate on forward-looking documentation only.
β Confirm with vendor: historical data requirements = NONE β If clinical templates exist, provide to NoteSwift for template training β Export current clinical note templates from PMS for reference β π΅ Share any custom terminology, abbreviations, or specialty-specific language
Security and HIPAA Compliance Verification
Pre-Go-Live Security Checklist
β π΅ Business Associate Agreement (BAA) fully executed β Verify NoteSwift SOC 2 Type II certification (request report if not provided) β Confirm data encryption: in-transit (TLS 1.2+) and at-rest (AES-256) β Review data retention policy with vendor β Confirm data residency (US-only servers for HIPAA) β Verify audit logging capabilities β Test user access controls (role-based permissions) β Confirm vendor's breach notification procedures β β οΈ Document all compliance items in your HIPAA risk assessment
DSO-Specific: Enterprise HIPAA Checklist
β π£ Legal review of BAA for enterprise terms β Centralized access control management via SSO β Audit log aggregation to central security console β Data governance policy updated to include AI documentation tools β Staff training on AI-specific HIPAA considerations (voice data handling) β Incident response plan updated to include NoteSwift-specific scenarios β Annual security review cadence with vendor established
DSO-Specific Configuration
Standardized Configuration Template (Identical Across All Locations)
| Setting | Standard Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Note format/template | [DSO standard template] | Consistency for audits, training |
| Procedure code mapping | ADA standard codes | Billing consistency |
| Auto-save interval | 30 seconds | Data protection |
| Session timeout | 15 minutes | HIPAA compliance |
| Audit log retention | 7 years | Legal/compliance requirement |
| User role definitions | Provider, Hygienist, Admin, Billing, Read-Only | Consistent access control |
| Default note template | [DSO clinical note template] | Documentation standardization |
| Alert/notification settings | [Standard notification rules] | Consistent user experience |
Location-Specific Configuration (May Vary)
| Setting | Local Discretion Allowed | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Provider preferences | Yes | Individual workflow optimization |
| Microphone sensitivity | Yes | Room acoustics vary |
| Specialty-specific templates | Yes | Perio, ortho, oral surgery variations |
| Appointment type mapping | Yes | Local scheduling conventions |
| Custom abbreviations | Limited (with approval) | Provider efficiency |
Testing Approach
Recommended: Centralized Test Environment
β Deploy single enterprise test tenant β Configure all location variations in test environment β Conduct integration testing centrally before location deployment β Distribute validated configuration to locations β Location-level validation testing (2 hours per location)
6. Team Training Plan
Train-the-Trainer Model
Champion Selection Criteria
Each location requires 1 designated champion who will:
- Receive advanced training directly from NoteSwift
- Train and support their local team
- Serve as first-line troubleshooting contact
- Provide feedback to central team
Ideal Champion Profile: β Office Manager OR senior clinical team member β Tech-comfortable (uses smartphone apps, adapts to new software easily) β Strong communication skills β Respected by clinical staff β Will be at location for β₯12 months β Available for 4-hour training + ongoing 2 hours/week support duties
Champion Responsibilities
| Phase | Responsibility | Time Commitment |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Launch | Complete advanced training, prepare local materials | 4 hours |
| Launch Week | Train all staff, provide real-time support | 8β10 hours |
| Weeks 2β4 | Daily check-ins with staff, troubleshooting | 5 hours/week |
| Ongoing | New hire training, refreshers, escalation | 2 hours/week |
Champion Certification Process
β π΅ Complete NoteSwift Champion Training (4 hours, vendor-led) β Pass certification quiz (80% minimum) β Complete 3 supervised training sessions β Sign champion agreement acknowledging responsibilities β Added to Champion communication channel (Slack/Teams)
Standardized Training Materials
Created Centrally (Do Not Modify):
- Training slide deck (vendor-provided + DSO customization)
- Quick reference cards per role
- Video library (NoteSwift basics, PMS integration, troubleshooting)
- Certification quiz
- FAQ document
Champion Customizes Locally:
- Schedule training sessions around local patient schedule
- Adapt examples to local procedures/specialties
- Add location-specific troubleshooting (e.g., network quirks)
Role-Specific Training Outlines
Dentists/Providers
Training Time: 90 minutes (60 min group + 30 min individual practice) Format: Live demo with hands-on practice
Session Outline:
| Time | Topic |
|---|---|
| 0β15 min | Why AI scribes, ROI for providers (reduced after-hours work) |
| 15β35 min | How NoteSwift works: demo of live transcription |
| 35β50 min | Workflow integration: when to start/stop, where notes appear |
| 50β65 min | Reviewing and editing AI-generated notes |
| 65β80 min | Hands-on practice with test patients |
| 80β90 min | Q&A, address concerns |
Common Resistance Points:
| Objection | Response |
|---|---|
| "AI can't capture my clinical judgment" | "You review and approve every noteβAI does the typing, you do the thinking" |
| "I'm faster with my current method" | "Give it 2 weeksβproviders typically save 60β90 minutes daily" |
| "What about patient privacy?" | "HIPAA-compliant, encrypted, BAA in placeβsame protections as your PMS" |
| "What if it makes mistakes?" | "Review workflow catches errors before signingβsimilar to reviewing a note from a human scribe" |
Day 1 Cheat Sheet for Providers:
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β NOTESWIFT PROVIDER QUICK REFERENCE β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ£
β START SESSION: Tap patient name β "Start Scribe" β
β SPEAK NORMALLY: No special commands needed β
β KEY PHRASES: β
β β’ "Chief complaint is..." β
β β’ "On examination, I note..." β
β β’ "Treatment plan includes..." β
β β’ "Patient consented to..." β
β END SESSION: Tap "Complete" when finished β
β REVIEW: Note appears in PMS within 60 seconds β
β EDIT: Click note, make changes, save β
β SIGN: Approve note like any other clinical note β
β β οΈ NEVER dictate with wrong patient selected β
β HELP: Ask [Champion Name] or call [Support Number] β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Hygienists
Training Time: 45 minutes Format: Group session with demo
Session Outline:
| Time | Topic |
|---|---|
| 0β10 min | Overview: what NoteSwift is, how it helps providers |
| 10β25 min | Hygienist touchpoints: when to start session (if applicable), perio charting integration |
| 25β35 min | Handoff workflow: what to communicate to provider about session status |
| 35β45 min | Troubleshooting basics, who to contact for help |
Day 1 Cheat Sheet for Hygienists:
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β NOTESWIFT HYGIENIST QUICK REFERENCE β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ£
β YOUR ROLE: [Start session/Handoff to provider] β
β IF STARTING SESSION: β
β β’ Confirm correct patient selected β
β β’ Tap "Start Scribe" before beginning β
β β’ Speak clearly during perio exam β
β IF PROVIDER STARTS: β
β β’ No action needed from you β
β HANDOFF: Tell provider
AI-generated implementation guide based on public vendor information. Verify specifics directly with NoteSwift.