Orca Dental AI
Step-by-step implementation guide — pre-implementation checklist, onboarding, staff training, go-live runbook, and ROI tracking.
Orca Dental AI — Implementation Playbook (DSO)
Orca Dental AI Implementation Playbook
Diagnostic Imaging AI for Dental Service Organizations
1. Executive Summary
What Orca Dental AI Does
Orca Dental AI is a diagnostic imaging platform that uses artificial intelligence to analyze dental radiographs—including bitewings, periapicals, and panoramic images—to detect pathology including caries, bone loss, periapical lesions, calculus, and other clinical findings. The system integrates with existing imaging workflows to provide real-time diagnostic support, generating annotated overlays and detailed findings reports that assist providers in treatment planning and patient communication.
Why DSOs Benefit from Diagnostic Imaging AI
Scale Advantages: Diagnostic AI delivers consistent analytical standards across every operatory in every location, regardless of individual provider experience or fatigue. A 30-location DSO performing 500,000+ radiographic analyses annually gains exponentially more value from a single implementation than a solo practice.
Standardization: AI eliminates diagnostic variability between providers—a critical concern for DSOs managing associate turnover and multi-location quality assurance. Every patient receives the same detection sensitivity whether they're seen by a veteran dentist or a recent graduate.
Data Aggregation: Enterprise deployment unlocks population-level insights impossible in fragmented systems. You can benchmark detection rates across locations, identify regional disease patterns, correlate diagnostic accuracy with case acceptance, and demonstrate clinical quality to payers, regulators, and acquirers.
Operational Leverage: One implementation, one training program, one vendor relationship—deployed across your entire portfolio. The marginal cost of adding location #50 is minimal compared to location #1.
Expected Timeline
| Phase | Duration | Milestone |
|---|---|---|
| Decision to Contract Execution | 2–4 weeks | BAA signed, SOW finalized |
| Pre-Implementation & Pilot Prep | 2–3 weeks | Wave 1 locations ready |
| Wave 1 Pilot (2–3 locations) | 4–6 weeks | Go/no-go validation |
| Wave 2 Expansion (5–8 locations) | 4–6 weeks | Playbook refinement |
| Wave 3+ Full Deployment | 8–16 weeks | Portfolio-wide coverage |
| Total: Decision to Full Deployment | 20–31 weeks | Varies by portfolio size |
For a 25-location DSO, expect approximately 6 months from contract to full deployment. For 50+ locations, plan for 8–10 months.
2. Pre-Implementation Checklist (Weeks 1–2)
Technical Requirements
Hardware Requirements (Per Location)
☐ Workstations: Minimum specs for AI processing
- CPU: Intel i5 (8th gen+) or AMD Ryzen 5 equivalent
- RAM: 16GB minimum
- GPU: Dedicated graphics with 4GB VRAM (if using local processing)
- Display: 1920x1080 minimum resolution; medical-grade monitors recommended for diagnostic review
☐ Imaging Equipment Compatibility
- Verify sensor/phosphor plate compatibility (Dexis, Schick, Planmeca, Carestream, etc.)
- Confirm panoramic unit DICOM output capability
- Document current imaging software versions at each location
☐ Network Infrastructure
- Minimum 100 Mbps symmetric bandwidth for cloud processing
- Latency under 50ms to cloud endpoints
- Verify firewall allows HTTPS traffic to Orca endpoints
Software Requirements
☐ Operating System: Windows 10/11 Pro (64-bit) or macOS 12+ depending on deployment model ☐ Browser: Chrome 90+ or Edge 90+ for web-based interface ☐ Imaging Software: Current version of existing imaging platform with TWAIN/DICOM export capability ☐ PMS: Compatible version (see integration section)
Enterprise-Level Requirements 🟣
☐ Network Standards Across Locations
- Document network topology for each location (static IP, VPN, direct internet)
- Standardize bandwidth requirements across portfolio
- Establish network monitoring protocol
☐ Centralized vs. Location-Level Hosting Decision 🟣
- Centralized Cloud (Recommended): Single tenant environment, unified data lake, consistent version control
- Location-Level: Consider only if regulatory or connectivity constraints exist
- Document decision and rationale for board records
☐ Single Sign-On (SSO) Integration
- Confirm SSO provider (Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace)
- Gather SAML/OIDC configuration requirements from Orca
- Plan role-based access control (RBAC) structure
☐ Centralized Credentialing
- Map provider credentials to Orca user provisioning
- Establish automated onboarding/offboarding workflow
- Define access levels: Provider, Hygienist, Admin, Regional, Corporate
Vendor Onboarding Steps 🔵
| Step | Owner | Timeline | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☐ Kick-off call with Orca implementation team | VP Operations + IT Lead | Day 1 | Mutual understanding of timeline and scope |
| ☐ Assign dedicated Orca Customer Success Manager | Orca | Day 1–3 | Named contact with direct line |
| ☐ Execute Business Associate Agreement | Legal + Orca | Week 1 | Signed BAA |
| ☐ Complete Orca security questionnaire | IT/InfoSec | Week 1 | Documented security posture |
| ☐ Establish technical support escalation path | IT Lead + Orca | Week 1 | Documented tiers and SLAs |
| ☐ Schedule weekly implementation syncs | Project Manager | Week 1 | Recurring calendar invite |
Key Contacts to Establish
☐ Internal Contacts Matrix
| Role | Name | Phone | Decision Authority | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive Sponsor | Final go/no-go | |||
| Project Manager | Day-to-day coordination | |||
| IT Lead | Technical decisions | |||
| Clinical Champion (CDO) | Clinical workflow approval | |||
| Regional Managers (list) | Location-level escalation |
☐ Orca Contacts Matrix 🔵
| Role | Name | Phone | Response SLA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer Success Manager | 24 hours | |||
| Technical Implementation Lead | 4 hours (business) | |||
| Tier 2 Support | 2 hours (critical) | |||
| Executive Sponsor (Orca) | As needed |
Data/Access Prerequisites
☐ System Access Inventory
| System | Access Type Needed | Credentials Obtained | Verified Working |
|---|---|---|---|
| PMS (Dentrix Enterprise, etc.) | API/Database read | ☐ | ☐ |
| Imaging Software | TWAIN/DICOM export | ☐ | ☐ |
| SSO Provider Admin | User provisioning | ☐ | ☐ |
| Network/Firewall Admin | Port/URL whitelisting | ☐ | ☐ |
| Imaging Archive (PACS/Server) | Historical image access | ☐ | ☐ |
☐ API Keys and Credentials 🔵
- Request API documentation from Orca (typically delivered Week 1)
- Generate API keys for test and production environments
- Document key rotation schedule and ownership
☐ Historical Image Migration Assessment
- Determine if historical images will be analyzed (adds significant value for trend analysis)
- Inventory storage locations and formats
- Estimate migration timeline and cost
Stakeholder Alignment Map 🟣
Board/Investor Level
| Stakeholder | Communication Need | Format | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board of Directors | Strategic rationale, ROI projection, timeline | Executive summary + deck | Pre-decision, then quarterly | CEO/CFO |
| Investors/PE Sponsors | Value creation narrative, risk mitigation | Brief + metrics dashboard | Quarterly or per ask | CFO |
Key Messages for This Level:
- AI diagnostic capability is becoming table stakes for competitive DSOs
- Implementation de-risks clinical quality variability during rapid growth
- Data assets created enable future value (predictive analytics, payer negotiations, exit valuation)
C-Suite Level
| Stakeholder | Communication Need | Format | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEO | Overall progress, strategic alignment | 1:1 verbal + written summary | Bi-weekly | VP Operations |
| CFO | Budget tracking, ROI milestone progress | Financial dashboard | Monthly | Project Manager |
| CDO/Clinical Leadership | Clinical workflow validation, provider adoption | Clinical review meeting | Weekly during rollout | Clinical Champion |
| CTO/IT Leadership | Technical integration, security compliance | Technical status report | Weekly | IT Lead |
Regional Manager Level
| Stakeholder | Communication Need | Format | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regional Managers | Location-specific rollout plans, champion coordination | Regional briefing call | Weekly during wave prep | Project Manager |
Location Level
| Stakeholder | Communication Need | Format | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office Managers | Operational changes, timeline, training schedule | Email + office visit | Pre-wave kickoff | Regional Manager |
| Providers | Clinical workflow changes, tool capabilities | CDO-led webinar or on-site | Pre-training | CDO/Clinical Champion |
| All Staff | General awareness, excitement | Internal newsletter/video | Monthly | Marketing/HR |
Baseline Metrics Collection ⚠️
Critical: Capture these metrics BEFORE go-live to enable ROI measurement. Inconsistent baseline data is the most common reason DSOs cannot demonstrate AI ROI.
Standardized Metrics Across All Locations
☐ Establish uniform measurement methodology for:
| Metric Category | Specific Metric | Measurement Method | Collection Tool | Collection Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Acceptance | Treatment plan acceptance rate | Accepted $ / Presented $ | PMS report | 2 weeks pre-wave |
| Case Acceptance | Same-day case acceptance rate | Cases accepted same visit / Cases presented | PMS report | 2 weeks pre-wave |
| Diagnostic Efficiency | Average time from imaging to treatment presentation | Timestamp analysis | Manual audit (20 cases/location) | 2 weeks pre-wave |
| Diagnostic Accuracy | Provider-to-provider variance in pathology detection | Audit of identical image sets | Manual review by CDO | 2 weeks pre-wave |
| Patient Communication | Time spent on radiograph explanation | Staff survey/time study | Survey tool | 2 weeks pre-wave |
| Claims Performance | Claim denial rate for diagnostic imaging codes | Denied claims / Total claims | PMS/billing report | 2 weeks pre-wave |
| Claims Performance | Average reimbursement per imaging procedure | Total imaging reimbursement / Procedure count | Billing system | 2 weeks pre-wave |
| Volume Metrics | Radiographs per day per location | Image count | Imaging software report | 2 weeks pre-wave |
☐ Create Standardized Baseline Report Template
- Distribute identical data collection template to all locations
- Designate single point of accountability per location (Office Manager)
- Set hard deadline for submission (2 weeks before Wave 1 go-live)
☐ Validate Data Quality ⚠️
- Cross-check submitted data against PMS reports
- Flag and investigate outliers (±2 standard deviations from mean)
- Document any locations with incomplete data and recovery plan
☐ Establish Centralized Baseline Database
- Store all baseline metrics in unified format
- Enable cross-location comparison
- Archive for post-deployment ROI analysis
3. Location Readiness Assessment
Scoring Framework
Rate each location 1–5 on the following factors:
Factor 1: IT Infrastructure Maturity
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Fiber internet (500+ Mbps), all workstations under 3 years old, current PMS/imaging versions, dedicated IT support |
| 4 | High-speed internet (100+ Mbps), most workstations under 4 years old, current software versions |
| 3 | Adequate internet (50+ Mbps), mixed workstation ages, software 1 version behind current |
| 2 | Basic internet (25–50 Mbps), some workstations 5+ years old, software 2+ versions behind |
| 1 | Unreliable internet (<25 Mbps), outdated hardware, legacy software requiring upgrade |
Factor 2: Staff Tenure and Adaptability
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Low turnover (<10% annual), history of successful tech adoption, documented training culture |
| 4 | Moderate turnover (10–20%), generally positive tech adoption history |
| 3 | Average turnover (20–30%), mixed results with past tech changes |
| 2 | High turnover (30–40%), some resistance to previous tech changes |
| 1 | Very high turnover (>40%), significant resistance to change documented |
Factor 3: Patient Volume
| Score | Criteria | Risk/Impact Note |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Top quartile volume (50+ patients/day) | Highest impact but also highest risk if issues occur |
| 4 | Above average (40–50 patients/day) | Strong impact, manageable risk |
| 3 | Average (30–40 patients/day) | Moderate impact, moderate risk—often ideal for pilot |
| 2 | Below average (20–30 patients/day) | Lower impact but good for cautious testing |
| 1 | Low volume (<20 patients/day) | Minimal disruption but slower learning |
Note: For Wave 1 pilots, moderate volume (Score 3) is often preferable to very high volume (Score 5) to balance learning speed with risk exposure.
Factor 4: Existing Tech Stack Compatibility
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Standardized PMS and imaging (Dentrix Enterprise + Dexis), verified Orca integration, API-ready |
| 4 | Supported PMS and imaging combo, integration pathway confirmed |
| 3 | Supported PMS, imaging may require middleware or manual workflow |
| 2 | Non-standard PMS or imaging requiring custom integration work |
| 1 | Legacy systems, major upgrade required before Orca deployment |
Factor 5: Local Champion Availability
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Tech-forward lead provider + enthusiastic office manager, both committed to champion role |
| 4 | One strong champion (provider OR office manager) fully committed |
| 3 | Potential champion identified but needs development/convincing |
| 2 | No obvious champion, may need to assign from regional level |
| 1 | Active resistance from key staff, significant change management required |
Scoring Worksheet
| Location | IT Infrastructure (1–5) | Staff Adaptability (1–5) | Patient Volume (1–5) | Tech Compatibility (1–5) | Local Champion (1–5) | Composite Score | Rollout Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location 1 | /25 | ||||||
| Location 2 | /25 | ||||||
| Location 3 | /25 | ||||||
| ... |
Recommended Rollout Sequence
Wave 1: Pilot Locations (Select 2–3)
Selection Criteria:
- Composite score 18–22 (strong but not your highest-performing locations)
- Tech Compatibility score ≥4 (minimize integration variables)
- Local Champion score ≥4 (essential for pilot success)
- Patient Volume score 2–4 (manageable volume, not highest risk)
- Geographic diversity if organization is regional
Rationale: Pilots should be set up for success while still being representative. Avoid both your best locations (no room to demonstrate improvement) and struggling locations (too many variables).
Wave 2: Early Expansion (5–8 locations)
Selection Criteria:
- Composite score 16–23
- At least one Wave 1 location in same region (leverage regional learning)
- Mix of volume levels to stress-test scaled operations
Wave 3+: Full Portfolio
Selection Criteria:
- All remaining locations
- Sequence by composite score (highest first within wave)
- May run multiple concurrent waves if Wave 2 demonstrates process maturity
Sample Rollout Sequence (25 Locations)
| Wave | Locations | Count | Timeline | Learning Objective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wave 1 | Springfield, Oak Park, Riverdale | 3 | Weeks 4–9 | Validate integration, training model, metrics tracking |
| Wave 2 | Naperville, Schaumburg, Evanston, Downers Grove, Orland Park | 5 | Weeks 10–15 | Scale training, test regional support model |
| Wave 3 | 8 locations (list) | 8 | Weeks 16–21 | Rapid deployment, efficiency optimization |
| Wave 4 | Remaining 9 locations | 9 | Weeks 22–27 | Full portfolio coverage |
4. Rollout Strategy
Wave Structure Overview
Week 1–3: Pre-Implementation (All)
│
Week 4–9: Wave 1 (2–3 Pilot Locations)
│
├─→ Learning Capture (1 week buffer)
│
Week 10–15: Wave 2 (5–8 Locations)
│
├─→ Learning Capture (1 week buffer)
│
Week 16+: Wave 3+ (Remaining Locations)
│
└─→ Full Deployment Complete
Wave 1: Pilot Deployment (Weeks 4–9)
Week 4: Pilot Preparation
☐ Final location confirmation 🟣
- Executive sponsor approves pilot location selection
- Regional managers notified and briefed
- Office managers contacted directly
☐ Technical environment setup 🔵
- Orca provisions pilot location accounts
- Test environment configured per location
- Integration connections established
☐ Champion onboarding
- Champions from all pilot locations attend centralized training (virtual or in-person)
- Champions receive implementation toolkit
- Champions conduct local readiness walkthrough
Weeks 5–6: Pilot Go-Live and Stabilization
☐ Go-live execution (See Section 8 for detailed runbook)
- Day 1: Monitored go-live at each pilot location
- Days 2–5: Intensive support period
- Days 6–10: Transition to standard support
☐ Daily check-ins
- 15-minute stand-up with each location champion
- Aggregate daily report to project manager
- Issue tracking and resolution documentation
☐ Real-time adjustment
- Workflow modifications documented
- Training gaps identified and addressed
- Technical issues escalated per SLA
Weeks 7–9: Pilot Validation
☐ Metrics collection
- Compare pilot metrics to baseline (same location)
- Document qualitative feedback from staff and patients
- Calculate preliminary ROI indicators
☐ Pilot review meeting 🟣
- Present findings to executive sponsor and C-suite
- Document lessons learned
- Refine playbook for Wave 2
Go/No-Go Criteria for Wave Advancement 🟣
Go Criteria (ALL must be met):
| Criterion | Threshold | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| Technical stability | <2 critical issues unresolved | Issue log review |
| User adoption | >80% of staff using tool consistently | Usage analytics |
| Workflow integration | Clinical workflow disruption "minor" or "none" | Champion survey |
| Data integrity | Zero patient data errors | Audit report |
| Support scalability | Support volume manageable by current team | Ticket analysis |
No-Go Triggers (ANY triggers pause):
| Trigger | Action |
|---|---|
| Unresolved critical technical issue affecting patient care | Halt all expansion until resolved |
| Provider adoption <50% | Root cause analysis required before proceeding |
| Major workflow disruption at >1 pilot location | Process redesign required |
| Security or compliance incident | Full investigation and remediation |
| Support capacity overwhelmed | Scale support resources before continuing |
Wave 2: Early Expansion (Weeks 10–15)
Timeline per Wave 2 Location
| Week | Activity | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Week 10 | Location prep, champion training | 1 week |
| Week 11 | Technical setup, testing | 1 week |
| Week 12 | Go-live | 1 week |
| Weeks 13–14 | Stabilization | 2 weeks |
| Week 15 | Validation and handoff to BAU | 1 week |
Wave 2 Refinements
☐ Apply lessons from Wave 1
- Updated training materials based on pilot feedback
- Modified integration steps if needed
- Refined support protocols
☐ Train-the-trainer cascade
- Wave 1 champions assist with Wave 2 champion training
- Regional managers take larger coordination role
- Central team shifts to oversight and exception handling
☐ Parallel location deployment
- Wave 2 locations may go live in sub-waves (e.g., 3 locations in Week 12, 2–3 in Week 14)
- Stagger to avoid overwhelming support capacity
Wave 3+: Full Deployment (Weeks 16+)
Scaling Principles
☐ Increase velocity
- Target 6–10 locations per wave
- Reduce per-location oversight as playbook matures
- Regional managers own go-live execution with central oversight
☐ Standardize ruthlessly
- No location-specific customizations without documented business case
- Same training, same configuration, same metrics
☐ Exception handling
- Document any location requiring non-standard approach
- Escalate to project manager for approval
Rollback Plan ⚠️
Rollback Triggers
| Trigger | Rollback Level |
|---|---|
| Critical system failure affecting >3 locations simultaneously | Full wave pause |
| Security/compliance incident | Immediate all-location pause |
| Major vendor-side outage (>4 hours) | Wave pause + vendor escalation |
| Single-location critical failure | Single-location rollback only |
Rollback Procedure
Single Location Rollback:
- Disable Orca integration at that location (IT Lead, <30 minutes)
- Revert to pre-Orca imaging workflow
- Notify regional manager and project manager
- Document root cause
- Develop remediation plan before re-enabling
Wave-Level Pause:
- Executive sponsor or designee authorizes pause 🟣
- Central IT disables integration for affected locations
- Communicate to all affected staff within 2 hours
- Vendor escalation to executive sponsor level 🔵
- Root cause analysis within 48 hours
- Go/no-go for resumption within 1 week
Key Principle: Rollback at one location or wave does NOT affect other locations already stable. Portfolio-wide rollback only in case of security/compliance incident.
5. Configuration & Integration (Weeks 2–3)
Practice Management System Integration
Dentrix Enterprise Integration 🔵
Estimated Time: 4–6 hours per location (after initial template setup)
Step-by-Step:
☐ Step 1: Verify Dentrix Enterprise version (minimum 7.0 recommended)
- Navigate to Help > About Dentrix
- Document version number
- If below minimum, schedule upgrade (add 1–2 weeks to timeline) ⚠️
☐ Step 2: Enable Dentrix API access 🔵
- Contact Henry Schein for API credentials (if not already enabled)
- Work with Orca implementation team to configure connection
- Orca typically handles this setup; provide credentials securely
☐ Step 3: Configure patient data mapping
- Map Dentrix patient ID to Orca patient record
- Verify provider ID mapping
- Test patient lookup with 5 sample records
☐ Step 4: Configure appointment integration (optional)
- Link Orca alerts to Dentrix appointment screen
- Configure timing of AI analysis relative to appointment
☐ Step 5: Test and validate
- Run 10 complete workflows (image capture → analysis → treatment plan)
- Verify data round-trip accuracy
- Document any mapping errors
Eaglesoft Integration 🔵
Estimated Time: 4–6 hours per location
Step-by-Step:
☐ Step 1: Verify Eaglesoft version (minimum 21.0 recommended)
- Navigate to Help > About Eaglesoft
- Document version number
☐ Step 2: Enable eCentral connectivity
- Ensure eCentral is configured for location
- Verify API access is enabled in Patterson portal
☐ Step 3: Configure Orca connection 🔵
- Orca team configures eCentral bridge
- Provide location-specific credentials
☐ Step 4: Map patient and provider data
- Verify Eaglesoft patient ID mapping
- Test provider routing for multi-provider locations
☐ Step 5: Validate integration
- Complete 10 test workflows
- Verify analysis results populate correctly
Open Dental Integration 🔵
Estimated Time: 3–5 hours per location
Step-by-Step:
☐ Step 1: Verify Open Dental version (current stable recommended)
- Setup > About Open Dental
- Document version
☐ Step 2: Enable API module
- Setup > Program Links > API
- Generate API key with appropriate permissions
- Provide key to Orca implementation team securely
☐ Step 3: Configure FHIR/API endpoint 🔵
- Orca configures connection to Open Dental API
- Test connectivity
☐ Step 4: Bridge module installation
- Install Orca bridge if required
- Configure bridge settings per Orca documentation
☐ Step 5: Validate complete workflow
Imaging System Integration 🔵
Dexis Integration
☐ Step 1: Verify Dexis Imaging Suite version
- Current versions: Dexis 9/10/11, Dexis IS
- Document version and sensor model
☐ Step 2: Configure TWAIN connection
- Enable TWAIN output in Dexis settings
- Configure export path for Orca processing
☐ Step 3: Test image capture to analysis workflow
- Capture test images (use test phantom if available)
- Verify Orca receives and processes images
- Confirm annotated results return to Dexis
DICOM-Compatible Systems (Planmeca, Carestream, etc.)
☐ Step 1: Verify DICOM export capability
- Check system settings for DICOM output
- Document DICOM AE title and port
☐ Step 2: Configure DICOM routing 🔵
- Orca provides DICOM destination configuration
- Route images to Orca processing endpoint
☐ Step 3: Test complete workflow
- Export test images
- Verify analysis results
- Confirm viewing workflow
Standardized Configuration Template
Enterprise Settings (Identical Across All Locations)
| Setting | Standard Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Detection sensitivity | Default (Medium) | Balanced false positive/negative rate |
| Pathology categories enabled | All (caries, bone loss, periapical lesions, calculus, other) | Comprehensive detection |
| Report format | Annotated image + findings list | Standardized provider experience |
| Alert threshold | All findings | Provider makes clinical judgment |
| Data retention | Per BAA (typically 7+ years) | Compliance |
| User authentication | SSO via [your provider] | Security standardization |
| Audit logging | Enabled, full | Compliance |
Location-Specific Configuration (May Vary)
| Setting | Default | Allowed Variation | Approval Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specialty-specific algorithms | General dentistry | Perio, pedo, oral surgery modules if applicable | Regional Manager |
| Provider notification preferences | In-app alert | Email, SMS additions | None |
| Report language preferences | English | Spanish if applicable | None |
| Local printer configuration | Location default | N/A | None |
Test Environment Approach 🔵
Recommended: Centralized Test Environment
☐ Central Test Tenant
- Orca provisions single test environment for DSO
- All locations tested against same environment
- Synthetic patient data used (never real PHI in test)
- Central IT owns test environment
Per-Location Testing Within Central Environment:
- Location-specific configuration tested in isolation
- 10-workflow validation checklist per location
- Signoff required before production promotion
Validation Checklist (Per Location)
☐ Image capture triggers Orca analysis ☐ Analysis completes within expected timeframe (<30 seconds) ☐ Annotated results display correctly ☐ Findings populate in PMS (if integrated) ☐ Provider can accept/modify AI findings ☐ Patient-facing report generates correctly (if applicable) ☐ Audit log captures all interactions ☐ User permissions function as expected ☐ Logout/timeout functions properly ☐ Support ticket from location reaches Orca ⚠️
Data Migration and Historical Analysis
Historical Image Analysis (Optional but Valuable)
☐ Assess historical image inventory
- Estimate image count per location (last 3 years typical)
- Document storage location and format
☐ Define analysis scope
- All patients or subset (e.g., active patients, recall-overdue)?
- Full history or rolling window?
☐ Execute migration 🔵
- Orca provides bulk import process
- Typically runs over several days/weeks depending on volume
- Schedule during low-usage hours
☐ Validate historical analysis
- Spot-check sample of historical analyses
- Verify integration with current patient records
Security and HIPAA Compliance Checklist
Enterprise-Level HIPAA Checklist
☐ Business Associate Agreement (BAA) 🔵
- BAA executed with Orca covering all locations
- BAA reviewed by legal counsel
- BAA stored in compliance repository
☐ Data Governance
- Document what PHI is shared with Orca
- Confirm data residency (US-based servers)
- Verify encryption at rest and in transit (AES-256, TLS 1.2+)
☐ Access Controls
- Role-based access defined (see Section 2)
- User provisioning tied to SSO
- Offboarding process includes Orca deprovisioning
☐ Audit Capabilities
- Verify Orca provides access logs
- Confirm logs retained per policy (minimum 6 years)
- Test log export capability
☐ Incident Response
- Confirm Orca's incident notification commitment (typically 24 hours)
- Integrate Orca into your incident response plan
- Document escalation path for security events
☐ Penetration Testing / SOC 2
- Request Orca's SOC 2 Type II report 🔵
- Review for any noted exceptions
- Document review in vendor file
☐ Data Disposal
- Confirm process for data deletion upon contract termination
- Include in BAA if not already specified
6. Team Training Plan
Train-the-Trainer Model
Champion Selection Criteria
Select 1 champion per location who meets these criteria:
| Criterion | Minimum Requirement |
|---|---|
| Role | Provider (preferred) or Office Manager |
| Tenure | Minimum 1 year at location |
| Tech comfort | Above average (prior tech adoption success) |
| Influence | Respected by peers, positive attitude |
| Availability | Can dedicate 8–12 hours to champion training |
| Willingness | Voluntarily commits (not assigned unwillingly) |
Champion Responsibilities
AI-generated implementation guide based on public vendor information. Verify specifics directly with Orca Dental AI.