Pearl
Step-by-step implementation guide — pre-implementation checklist, onboarding, staff training, go-live runbook, and ROI tracking.
Pearl — Implementation Playbook (DSO)
Pearl AI Implementation Playbook for DSOs
Diagnostic Imaging AI Deployment Guide
1. Executive Summary
What Pearl Does
Pearl is an FDA-cleared AI-powered diagnostic imaging platform that analyzes dental radiographs in real-time to detect pathology, including caries, periapical lesions, calculus, and bone loss. The system overlays findings directly onto X-rays within your existing imaging workflow, providing objective clinical decision support that enhances diagnostic accuracy and consistency across providers.
Why DSOs Specifically Benefit from Diagnostic Imaging AI
Scale Advantages: Deploying Pearl across 15–50 locations creates a force multiplier effect—standardized diagnostic quality regardless of provider experience level, reduced inter-examiner variability, and consistent patient communication around findings.
Standardization Value: DSOs struggle with diagnostic consistency across providers. Pearl establishes an objective baseline that makes clinical oversight, peer review, and quality assurance measurable. Your CDO gains visibility into diagnostic patterns across the entire organization.
Data Aggregation Power: Enterprise-level Pearl deployment unlocks population health insights, regional disease prevalence trends, and provider performance benchmarking impossible at the single-practice level. This data feeds strategic decisions around service mix, staffing, and market expansion.
Expected Timeline: Decision to Full Deployment
| DSO Size | Pilot Phase | Full Deployment | Total Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15–25 locations | 6–8 weeks | 12–16 weeks | 4–6 months |
| 26–50 locations | 8–10 weeks | 16–24 weeks | 6–8 months |
Timeline assumes adequate IT infrastructure and reasonable staff turnover rates. Add 4–6 weeks if significant hardware upgrades required.
2. Pre-Implementation Checklist (Weeks 1–2)
Technical Requirements
Hardware Requirements
☐ Workstations: Windows 10/11 (64-bit), minimum 8GB RAM (16GB recommended), Intel i5 or equivalent processor ☐ Display: Minimum 1920x1080 resolution; diagnostic monitors preferred for clinical workstations ☐ Digital radiography sensors: Verify Pearl compatibility with existing sensor brands (Dexis, Schick, Carestream, etc.) ☐ Panoramic/CBCT units: Confirm model compatibility with Pearl's Second Opinion® platform
Network Requirements
☐ Minimum 25 Mbps download/10 Mbps upload per location (50/20 Mbps recommended) ☐ Latency under 100ms to Pearl cloud infrastructure ☐ Firewall exceptions for Pearl domains (vendor provides whitelist) ☐ SSL/TLS 1.2 or higher enabled
Software Requirements
☐ Practice Management System: Verify integration availability (Dentrix, Eaglesoft, Open Dental, Denticon, Curve) ☐ Imaging software: TWAIN or DICOM compatibility verification ☐ Browser: Chrome (latest), Edge (latest) for Pearl Practice Intelligence dashboard
⚠️ Common Failure Point: Outdated imaging software versions frequently cause integration failures. Audit all locations for software currency before proceeding.
Vendor Onboarding Steps
| Step | Owner | Vendor Contact | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔵 Execute Master Services Agreement | Legal/CDO | Pearl Enterprise Sales | Day 1–3 |
| 🔵 Complete BAA for all entities | Compliance | Pearl Legal | Day 1–5 |
| 🔵 Assign dedicated Customer Success Manager | VP Ops | Pearl CS Team | Day 3 |
| 🔵 Schedule technical discovery call | IT Director | Pearl Implementation | Day 5 |
| 🔵 Obtain enterprise admin credentials | IT Director | Pearl CS | Day 7 |
| 🔵 Request API documentation | IT Director | Pearl Technical | Day 7 |
Key Vendor Contacts to Establish
☐ Enterprise Account Executive (strategic/contract issues) ☐ Customer Success Manager (ongoing relationship) ☐ Technical Implementation Specialist (integration) ☐ Support escalation path (Tier 1 → Tier 2 → Engineering)
Data/Access Prerequisites
☐ Centralized admin account with SSO integration (if applicable) ☐ Location-level admin accounts for each practice ☐ API keys for PMS integration (per location or enterprise-level) ☐ Imaging archive access credentials ☐ Historical image repository location and format documentation ☐ PACS/VNA access if centralized imaging storage exists
🔵 Vendor Required: Pearl will need read access to your imaging directories. Prepare file path documentation for all locations.
Enterprise-Level Requirements
Network Standards Across Locations
☐ Document current network topology for each location ☐ Identify locations requiring network upgrades ☐ Establish minimum bandwidth standards (25/10 Mbps floor) ☐ VPN vs. direct cloud connection decision 🟣 ☐ Network monitoring capability for troubleshooting
Hosting Architecture Decision 🟣
| Approach | Pros | Cons | Recommended When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralized Cloud | Simplified management, unified updates | Single point of failure, bandwidth dependency | Locations have reliable connectivity |
| Hybrid | Resilience, local caching | More complex, higher maintenance | Mixed connectivity quality across locations |
Recommendation: Pearl's cloud-native architecture favors centralized hosting. Request Pearl's enterprise architecture document for your specific deployment model.
Authentication & Credentialing
☐ SSO integration requirements (SAML 2.0, OAuth) ☐ Active Directory/Azure AD integration ☐ Role-based access control (RBAC) structure mapping ☐ Provider credential linking protocol (NPI, state license) ☐ Centralized user provisioning workflow
Stakeholder Alignment Map
Board/Investors 🟣
- Communication: Technology investment ROI thesis
- Decision authority: Capital expenditure approval if hardware refresh required
- Update cadence: Quarterly strategic update
- Owner: CEO
C-Suite
| Role | Interest | Engagement Level |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | Strategic differentiation, ROI | Approve, sponsor |
| CDO | Clinical quality, liability | Drive adoption, set standards |
| CFO | Cost, ROI, revenue impact | Approve, monitor |
| VP Operations | Execution, workflow | Own implementation |
| CIO/IT Director | Technical, security | Own integration |
Regional Managers
- Communication: Rollout plan, location sequencing rationale, escalation paths
- Decision authority: Local resource allocation, champion selection
- Update cadence: Weekly during rollout
- Owner: VP Operations
Location-Level Office Managers
- Communication: Timeline, training schedule, workflow changes, patient communication
- Decision authority: Local scheduling adjustments
- Update cadence: Daily during go-live week
- Owner: Regional Manager
Providers
- Communication: Clinical benefits, workflow changes, override protocols
- Decision authority: Clinical use discretion (within DSO standards)
- Update cadence: Pre-go-live training, weekly feedback loops
- Owner: CDO
Baseline Metrics to Capture BEFORE Go-Live
⚠️ Critical: These metrics must be captured identically across all locations to enable cross-location comparison post-deployment.
Clinical Metrics
☐ Caries detection rate per 100 BWX exams (by provider, by location) ☐ Average number of findings per FMX (by provider, by location) ☐ Perio diagnosis rate (% of exams with bone loss noted) ☐ Referral rate for endo/perio specialty care
Operational Metrics
☐ Average diagnosis presentation time (image capture to treatment plan delivery) ☐ Case acceptance rate (by procedure category, by provider, by location) ☐ Treatment plan value per exam ☐ Time from diagnosis to treatment start
Financial Metrics
☐ Revenue per patient visit ☐ Claim denial rate (by procedure code) ☐ Collection rate ☐ Radiograph retake rate (cost indicator)
Measurement Standardization Protocol
- Define calculation methodology centrally (e.g., case acceptance = scheduled procedures / recommended procedures)
- Set measurement period (recommend: trailing 90 days pre-implementation)
- Extract from PMS using standardized reports (create report templates for each PMS platform)
- Validate data with office managers before finalizing baseline
- Store in centralized dashboard for post-implementation comparison
🟣 Executive Decision Required: Define acceptable data quality thresholds. If a location cannot produce reliable baseline metrics, decide whether to delay their rollout or proceed without comparison capability.
3. Location Readiness Assessment
Scoring Framework (1–5 Scale)
Factor 1: IT Infrastructure Maturity
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Fiber internet, <2 yr old workstations, current PMS version, existing API integrations |
| 4 | Cable/high-speed internet, 2–4 yr old workstations, recent PMS updates |
| 3 | Adequate internet (25+ Mbps), functional hardware, PMS within support window |
| 2 | Marginal internet, aging workstations, PMS version 1–2 behind current |
| 1 | Unreliable connectivity, 5+ yr old hardware, legacy PMS requiring upgrade |
Assessment Method: IT audit spreadsheet completed by office manager, verified by IT team remotely or on-site.
Factor 2: Staff Tenure and Adaptability
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | <10% annual turnover, previous successful tech implementations, documented training culture |
| 4 | 10–20% turnover, 1+ successful tech implementation in past 2 years |
| 3 | 20–30% turnover, mixed tech implementation history, stable core team |
| 2 | 30–40% turnover, tech implementations have been rocky |
| 1 | >40% turnover, significant resistance to change, no recent tech adoption |
Assessment Method: HR data pull + regional manager qualitative assessment.
Factor 3: Patient Volume
| Score | Criteria | Risk/Impact Profile |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Top quartile volume | Highest impact, highest risk—ideal for Wave 2/3 |
| 4 | Above average volume | High impact, moderate risk |
| 3 | Average volume | Moderate impact, moderate risk—ideal for Wave 1 pilot |
| 2 | Below average volume | Lower impact, lower risk—good for pilot if other factors strong |
| 1 | Struggling volume | May indicate other issues; delay until stabilized |
Note: High volume is NOT always better for early waves. Moderate volume locations with strong other factors make better pilots.
Factor 4: Existing Tech Stack Compatibility
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | PMS with proven Pearl integration, digital sensors on Pearl compatibility list, no imaging workflow conflicts |
| 4 | PMS with Pearl integration available, minor configuration needs |
| 3 | PMS integration available but not previously deployed, may require custom work |
| 2 | PMS integration exists but limited; imaging workflow changes required |
| 1 | PMS has no existing Pearl integration; would require workaround or middleware |
Assessment Method: 🔵 Pearl technical team pre-assessment call (request for each location grouping by PMS/imaging stack).
Factor 5: Local Champion Availability
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Tech-forward provider + engaged office manager both volunteered as champions |
| 4 | Either tech-forward provider OR strong office manager available and willing |
| 3 | Office manager willing but not tech-savvy; provider neutral |
| 2 | No clear champion; would need to develop one |
| 1 | Office manager or key provider actively resistant; leadership vacuum |
Assessment Method: Regional manager nomination + brief call with potential champion to assess genuine interest.
Composite Scoring & Rollout Sequencing
Scoring Calculation
| Factor | Weight | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| IT Infrastructure | 25% | Foundation—without this, nothing works |
| Staff Adaptability | 25% | Adoption is a people problem |
| Tech Stack Compatibility | 20% | Reduces implementation complexity |
| Local Champion | 20% | #1 predictor of location success |
| Patient Volume | 10% | Impact factor, but managed in wave selection |
Composite Score = (IT × 0.25) + (Staff × 0.25) + (TechStack × 0.20) + (Champion × 0.20) + (Volume × 0.10)
Rollout Sequencing Recommendation
| Composite Score | Wave Assignment | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0–5.0 | Wave 1 (Pilot) | High probability of success; will generate proof points |
| 3.5–3.9 | Wave 2 | Solid readiness; benefits from pilot learnings |
| 3.0–3.4 | Wave 3 | May need remediation work during earlier waves |
| 2.5–2.9 | Wave 4 (if applicable) | Address infrastructure/people gaps first |
| <2.5 | Remediation Hold | Do not deploy until score improves |
Sample Location Assessment Matrix
| Location | IT (25%) | Staff (25%) | Tech (20%) | Champion (20%) | Volume (10%) | Composite | Wave |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix Central | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4.55 | 1 |
| Scottsdale North | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | 1 |
| Tempe Main | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3.60 | 2 |
| Mesa East | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3.20 | 3 |
| Tucson Downtown | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2.40 | Hold |
⚠️ Common Failure Point: Don't let enthusiasm override readiness. A failed pilot location damages the entire rollout narrative. Select Wave 1 locations that will succeed.
4. Rollout Strategy
Wave Structure Recommendation
For DSOs with 15–25 Locations
| Wave | Locations | Duration | Buffer | Cumulative % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wave 1 (Pilot) | 2–3 | 4 weeks | 2 weeks | 10–15% |
| Wave 2 | 5–7 | 4 weeks | 1 week | 40–50% |
| Wave 3 | 7–10 | 4 weeks | 1 week | 85–100% |
| Wave 4 (Cleanup) | Remaining | 2–3 weeks | — | 100% |
For DSOs with 26–50 Locations
| Wave | Locations | Duration | Buffer | Cumulative % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wave 1 (Pilot) | 3–4 | 4 weeks | 2 weeks | 8–10% |
| Wave 2 | 6–10 | 4 weeks | 2 weeks | 25–30% |
| Wave 3 | 10–15 | 4 weeks | 1 week | 55–65% |
| Wave 4 | 10–15 | 4 weeks | 1 week | 85–95% |
| Wave 5 (Cleanup) | Remaining | 2–3 weeks | — | 100% |
Wave 1 Pilot Selection Criteria
Select 2–4 locations that meet ALL of the following:
☐ Composite readiness score ≥ 4.0 ☐ Identified champion available and committed ☐ Represents typical location profile (not your flagship or most unique location) ☐ Geographic proximity (enables in-person support if needed) ☐ PMS diversity representation (if you run multiple PMS platforms, include at least one of each in pilot) ☐ Provider mix representation (include at least one location with newer associates, not just senior partners)
🟣 Executive Decision: Balance "sure wins" with representation. A pilot that only includes your best locations won't surface issues you'll hit at scale.
Timeline Per Wave
Wave 1 Detailed Timeline (6 weeks total)
Week 1: Pre-Go-Live
- Day 1–2: Champion training (on-site or virtual intensive)
- Day 3–4: Technical integration verification
- Day 5: Staff training (all roles)
Week 2: Go-Live
- Day 1: Launch with full vendor support
- Days 2–5: Daily check-ins with champion
Weeks 3–4: Stabilization
- Twice-weekly check-ins
- Workflow refinement
- Issue documentation
Weeks 5–6: Assessment
- Metrics comparison vs. baseline
- Staff feedback collection
- Go/no-go decision for Wave 2
- Lessons learned documentation
Buffer (2 weeks)
- Process refinement
- Training material updates
- Champion certification for Wave 2 support
Waves 2+ Condensed Timeline (5 weeks per wave)
Pilot learnings allow compression:
- Week 1: Champion training + integration verification + staff training
- Week 2: Go-live
- Weeks 3–4: Stabilization
- Week 5: Assessment + go/no-go for next wave
- Buffer: 1–2 weeks
Go/No-Go Criteria
Criteria to Advance from Wave 1 to Wave 2 🟣
| Criteria | Threshold | Status |
|---|---|---|
| System uptime | ≥99% during pilot period | |
| Integration stability | Zero critical integration failures | |
| Staff training completion | 100% of required roles trained | |
| Champion confidence | Champion rates readiness ≥8/10 | |
| Provider adoption | ≥80% of providers using in workflow | |
| Patient-facing issues | Zero patient complaints related to AI | |
| Net Promoter (internal) | Staff NPS ≥0 (not negative) |
All criteria must be met to proceed. Any critical failure requires remediation and extended pilot.
Escalation Path for Go/No-Go Decision
- Implementation team recommendation → VP Operations
- VP Operations decision for Wave 2
- CDO input required if clinical concerns raised
- CEO notification if Wave 1 fails 🟣
Rollback Plan
Triggers for Wave Rollback
- Critical integration failure affecting patient care
- Data security incident
25% provider refusal to use system
- Sustained system performance issues (>4 hours cumulative downtime in any week)
Rollback Procedure
Immediate (within hours):
- Disable Pearl overlay in imaging software
- Notify regional manager and VP Operations
- Document incident details
- 🔵 Contact Pearl emergency support
Short-term (within 24 hours):
- Staff communication: "Temporary pause for optimization"
- Patient communication script if needed
- Root cause analysis initiation
Recovery:
- Resolve root cause with Pearl
- Test fix in isolated environment
- Re-deploy with additional monitoring
- Extended stabilization period before resuming wave progression
⚠️ Key Principle: A single location rollback does NOT stop the entire wave. Isolate the failing location, continue with others, and address the issue in parallel.
5. Configuration & Integration (Weeks 2–3)
Practice Management System Integrations
Dentrix Integration
Prerequisites: ☐ Dentrix G7.5 or higher (G8 recommended) ☐ ePrescribe module enabled ☐ Document Center active ☐ Valid Dentrix support agreement
Step-by-Step Integration:
- ☐ 🔵 Obtain Pearl Dentrix integration package from Pearl support
- ☐ Backup Dentrix database before any installation
- ☐ Install Pearl Bridge Service on Dentrix server (15 min)
- ☐ Configure bridge service with Pearl API credentials
- ☐ Map Dentrix user accounts to Pearl user accounts
- ☐ Configure auto-launch settings for Pearl with image capture
- ☐ ⚠️ Test with sample patient (use designated test patient record)
- ☐ Verify findings transfer to clinical notes
- ☐ Configure Document Center auto-filing for Pearl reports
- ☐ Test with 5 different providers to verify user mapping
Estimated time: 2–3 hours per location (experienced IT); 4–5 hours (first-time deployment)
Eaglesoft Integration
Prerequisites: ☐ Eaglesoft 21.20 or higher ☐ Smart Image module installed ☐ API access enabled (Patterson support call may be required)
Step-by-Step Integration:
- ☐ 🔵 Request Pearl Eaglesoft integration installer
- ☐ Verify Patterson API access is active
- ☐ ⚠️ Disable Eaglesoft Smart Image AI features to prevent conflict
- ☐ Install Pearl integration service
- ☐ Configure TWAIN bridge settings
- ☐ Map user credentials
- ☐ Test sensor trigger → Pearl capture → Eaglesoft display flow
- ☐ Configure clinical notes integration
- ☐ Verify patient data sync (name, DOB, chart number)
- ☐ Test treatment planning workflow impact
Estimated time: 3–4 hours per location
⚠️ Common Failure Point: Patterson API access often requires escalation. Start this process 2 weeks before planned integration.
Open Dental Integration
Prerequisites: ☐ Open Dental version 22.1 or higher ☐ API key generated in Open Dental (Setup → Advanced Setup → API) ☐ Direct database access credentials (if using on-premise)
Step-by-Step Integration:
- ☐ Generate Open Dental API key with appropriate permissions
- ☐ 🔵 Provide API key to Pearl implementation team
- ☐ Install Pearl Open Dental bridge
- ☐ Configure webhook endpoints (if using cloud sync)
- ☐ Map user accounts via Pearl admin console
- ☐ Test image capture → Pearl analysis → Open Dental display
- ☐ Configure treatment plan integration
- ☐ Set up procedure code mapping for Pearl-detected findings
- ☐ Test with multiple image types (BWX, PA, Pano)
- ☐ Verify audit trail logging
Estimated time: 2–3 hours per location (Open Dental's open architecture simplifies integration)
Denticon (Cloud) Integration
Prerequisites: ☐ Denticon Enterprise license ☐ Admin access to Denticon ☐ 🔵 Pearl-Denticon integration enabled (contact Planet DDS)
Step-by-Step Integration:
- ☐ 🔵 Planet DDS enables Pearl integration in Denticon backend
- ☐ Configure Pearl API credentials in Denticon admin
- ☐ Map provider credentials
- ☐ Configure image routing rules
- ☐ Test cloud-to-cloud image transfer
- ☐ Verify latency (target: <3 seconds from capture to analysis)
- ☐ Configure treatment plan integration
- ☐ Test multi-location user access
Estimated time: 1–2 hours per location (cloud-to-cloud simplifies process)
Imaging System Integration
Sensor/Direct Digital Radiography
| Sensor Brand | Integration Method | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Dexis | TWAIN, native integration | Full support, direct capture |
| Schick | TWAIN | Verify TWAIN driver version |
| Carestream | TWAIN, DICOM | Preferred: DICOM for advanced features |
| Gendex | TWAIN | Test capture timing |
| XDR | TWAIN | May require driver update |
Standard Sensor Integration Steps:
- ☐ Document current imaging software and sensor model
- ☐ Install/verify TWAIN drivers (current versions)
- ☐ Configure Pearl as TWAIN device destination
- ☐ Test single image capture
- ☐ Test FMX sequence capture
- ☐ Test BWX set capture
- ☐ Verify image quality transmission (no compression artifacts)
- ☐ Confirm patient data association
Panoramic/CBCT Integration
| Equipment | Integration Method | Pearl Capability |
|---|---|---|
| Planmeca | DICOM | Pano analysis, CBCT limited |
| Carestream | DICOM | Full pano support |
| Dentsply Sirona | DICOM | Pano analysis |
| i-CAT | DICOM | Pano analysis |
| CBCT General | DICOM | Limited—2D analysis of exports |
⚠️ Note: Pearl's primary strength is 2D radiograph analysis. CBCT integration is evolving—confirm current capabilities with Pearl before setting expectations.
Pano/CBCT Integration Steps:
- ☐ Enable DICOM export on imaging equipment
- ☐ Configure DICOM send to Pearl endpoint
- ☐ 🔵 Provide equipment model and DICOM settings to Pearl
- ☐ Test single pano transmission
- ☐ Verify patient data in DICOM header transfers correctly
- ☐ Configure auto-send vs. manual send workflow
- ☐ Test image display in Pearl Practice Intelligence
Test Environment Setup
Centralized Test Environment (Recommended for DSOs)
☐ Establish dedicated test tenant in Pearl (separate from production) ☐ Create test patient records (minimum 10 with varied conditions) ☐ Configure test environment to mirror production settings ☐ Develop standard test cases:
- Single PA capture
- 4BW set capture
- FMX capture
- Pano capture
- Multi-user simultaneous use
- Network interruption recovery
Validation Checklist
☐ Image capture triggers Pearl analysis ☐ Analysis completes in <10 seconds for 2D radiographs ☐ Findings overlay displays correctly on image ☐ Findings summary transfers to PMS clinical notes ☐ Provider can accept/modify/reject findings ☐ Patient record correctly associated ☐ Audit trail captures provider decisions ☐ System recovers gracefully from network interruption ☐ Multiple providers can analyze simultaneously ☐ Reports generate correctly
Historical Data Ingestion
🟣 Decision Required: Will you import historical images for Pearl analysis?
| Approach | Pros | Cons | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No historical import | Faster deployment, cleaner baseline | No retrospective analysis | Recommended for initial deployment |
| Selective import (12 months) | Enables comparison studies | Moderate effort, storage costs | Consider after stabilization |
| Full archive import | Complete historical analysis | High effort, diminishing returns | Not recommended initially |
If Historical Import Desired:
- ☐ Document image archive location and format
- ☐ Calculate storage volume (GB/TB)
- ☐ 🔵 Engage Pearl professional services for migration planning
- ☐ Establish patient matching protocol (chart number, name, DOB)
- ☐ Plan batch import schedule (off-hours recommended)
- ☐ Define success criteria for import validation
Security and HIPAA Compliance Verification
Enterprise-Level HIPAA Checklist
☐ Business Associate Agreement (BAA)
- 🔵 Execute BAA with Pearl (covers all entities)
- Verify BAA terms align with your security requirements
- Document BAA in compliance repository
☐ Data Governance
- Document what PHI Pearl accesses (images, patient demographics)
- Map data flow: capture → transmission → Pearl cloud → storage → return
- Verify Pearl's data retention policy aligns with your requirements
- Confirm data deletion protocols
☐ Access Controls
- Implement role-based access control (RBAC)
- Configure SSO integration
- Enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) for admin accounts
- Document user provisioning/deprovisioning procedures
- Establish quarterly access review cadence
☐ Transmission Security
- Verify TLS 1.2+ for all data transmission
- Confirm encryption at rest (AES-256 or equivalent)
- Document network security requirements
☐ Audit Logging
- Verify Pearl audit logs capture required events
- Configure log retention (minimum 6 years for HIPAA)
- Establish log review procedures
☐ Incident Response
- Document Pearl's breach notification procedures
- Establish communication protocol with Pearl security team
- Test incident response escalation path
☐ Risk Assessment
- Add Pearl to organizational risk assessment
- Document risk treatment decisions
- Schedule annual review
🔵 Vendor Required: Request Pearl's SOC 2 Type II report and HIPAA compliance documentation.
Enterprise Configuration Standards
Standardized Configuration Template
Settings to Standardize Centrally:
| Setting | Standard Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Detection sensitivity | Medium (default) | Consistent diagnostic thresholds |
| Pathology categories enabled | All categories ON | Comprehensive screening |
| Auto-overlay display | Enabled | Consistent provider experience |
| Clinical note integration | Enabled | Documentation compliance |
| Report format | Standard DSO template | Unified patient communication |
| User timeout | 15 minutes | HIPAA compliance |
| Audit logging | Full | Compliance requirement |
| Alert thresholds | Per CDO specification | Clinical governance |
Location-Specific Configuration Allowed
| Setting | Local Discretion | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Provider-specific preferences | Yes (within bounds) | Provider workflow accommodation |
| Specialty emphasis | Yes | Endo vs. GP vs. Pedo different needs |
| Patient communication scripts | Yes (from approved templates) | Local patient population |
| Monitor display preferences | Yes | Hardware variability |
| Report printer settings | Yes | Equipment differences |
6. Team Training Plan
Train-the-Trainer Model
Champion Selection Criteria
Select one primary champion per location, with a backup champion identified:
Required Characteristics: ☐ Minimum 12 months tenure at location ☐ Demonstrated technology aptitude (successful adoption of previous tech) ☐ Respected by clinical and admin staff ☐ Available for 6–8 hours initial training ☐ Committed to ongoing champion responsibilities ☐ Communication skills to train others
Ideal Champion Profiles (in priority order):
- Tech-forward associate dentist with teaching inclination
- Senior hygienist with influence and tech comfort
- Engaged office manager with clinical understanding
- Lead dental assistant with peer respect
Not Recommended:
- Newest staff members (insufficient credibility)
- Providers with historical tech resistance (will undermine)
- Staff with planned departures within 6 months
Champion Responsibilities
During Rollout:
- Complete champion certification training
- Conduct staff training at their location
- Serve as first-line support for questions
- Document issues and feedback
- Participate in daily check-ins during go-live week
- Provide weekly feedback to central team
Ongoing:
- Train new hires
- Conduct quarterly refresher sessions
- Escalate unresolved issues
- Share best practices with other champions
- Participate in monthly champion calls
Champion Certification Training
Duration: 6–8 hours (can be split across two days)
Format: Live virtual or in-person with Pearl trainer + internal implementation team
Curriculum:
| Module | Duration | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Pearl Platform Overview | 1 hr | Product capabilities, AI fundamentals, evidence base |
| Clinical Workflow Deep Dive | 2 hrs | Image capture, analysis, interpretation, documentation |
| Hands-On Practice | 2 hrs | Guided practice with sample cases, edge cases |
| Training Delivery Skills | 1 hr | How to train |
AI-generated implementation guide based on public vendor information. Verify specifics directly with Pearl.